- Qzone log
| Back to logs list
Reprinted from alumni of the user at 00:20 on September 16, 2010 Reading (loading. ..) Comments (0) Category: share
the National Natural Science Foundation of the tender appraisal review process indicators and scores
1. Theoretical Basis: 420 minutes
2. research program: 330 minutes
3. Research Foundation: 250
Total 1000 points
I. Theoretical Basis (420 points)
1. the significance of the research (100 points)
important issues involved in important areas, has important theoretical value or prospects
2. Scientific: (90 points)
background to the study: domestic and international research status n
current problems: the starting point n
proposed study of ideas: Research Aims and n
3. academic thought and innovation (150 points)
theoretical innovation: the new theory or theoretical n
Method Innovation: A New Method n
technological innovation: technology improvement or complete n
4. on the domestic Research outside the understanding (80 points)
breadth and depth: the past 5 years, major research studies in progress n
Problems
References: foreign literature in recent 5 years the number n :20-30
Second, the research program
(330 points)
1. research content and key issues to be addressed (80 points)
appropriate range :3-5 highlights the content of n
: 1 -2 key select the key issues n
accurate key issue :1-2 n
2. technical line (90 points)
designed: basic and clinical n
feasible: can mature and reliable reproducible and easy to master n
3. research methods and tools (90 points)
method is advanced: n
mature and reliable technology: n
innovative: n
4. research targets (70 points):
clear, can be achieved, leaving room for.
published research papers: n
patent applications: n
can be applied to product development: n
Third, the research base
(250 points)
1. with the project accumulation of related work (90 points)
principal investigator of the research background and experience: n
and preliminary studies relevant to the study: n
n has published research papers:
2. already have experimental conditions (80 points)
laboratory conditions: The main instruments and equipment n
n technical conditions: experimental model, the results of preliminary experiments, the key experimental materials
domestic and international cooperation: cooperation in the background and technological advantages n
3. project team (80 points)
key members of the 6-10, reasonable structure
senior research staff (1-2 people) n
Intermediate researchers (2 - 3) n
n technical staff and graduate students (3-5 people)
four budget
staff costs: 5% n
Management Fee: 5% n
equipment costs: \10% n
n cooperation fee: \br> n academic standards: what has been achieved
scientific attitude: Style n
character and importance of the project: theoretical significance and practical value of n
n experimental conditions: Can you meet the research needs
Sixth, how to improve the successful rate
1. Selected topics Applicant:
2. prequalification bids and modify:
3. Optimization Team:
4. incubators, support issues items:
talk about the staff echelon:
project team members (80 points)
key members of the 6-10, reasonable structure
senior research staff (1-2 people)
Intermediate Researchers (2-3)
technical staff and graduate students (3-5 people)
focus
tender summary and project basis,
1, Summary limit of 400 words, so pay special attention focused, to prevent the \
2,
[Transferred] back my love - Qzone log, point (deduction) must be clear, very sure.
3,
我想成为你的第一小我私家 - Qzone日记, the study of meaning based project to fight straight to the point, do not say too much related but not directly linked to it, mainly to make it clear what you find, are going and how to do it. Research situation not too much, but in addition to the latest magazine article other than the best experts in the field by adding some new domestic articles, not trying to evade, and if you happen to run into the expert review, so much the better.
4, preferably including the basis of an existing work,
Dove - Qzone log, the result has been published in magazines and columns, can increase credibility.
Second, the research and programs should not complex, so too cluttered, there is a flow chart of the steps the best. In fact, I asked several of evaluation experts, a tender look up to half an hour.
Third, feasibility analysis may include: theoretically possible, there is the basis of preliminary experiments, group members strong, mature technology, laboratory equipment and secure these parts.
3 points are not possible in the
for your reference: 1. the research base does not; (responses: Menggan year, several high-level published articles) 2. a good basis and ideas, but did not tender in terms of written expression; (to see how people write, owner has been very clear) 3. human relations did not go through, (Oh, holding a hand grenade to blow it everywhere.)
labels the tender applications for the Fund of Natural Science
Kolczyki
Linear Mode
