Office 2010 Pro Plus WebKit Team Admits Error, Dow

[jhjkrhsd]

Do you construct amazing web pages? Are you a net developer who crafts wonderful HTML5CSSJS? If so, you'll want to attempt HiFi. It can be a brand new website publishing platform that provides you 100% handle about your HTML mark-up. I aided create it. Test it out and inform me what you believe. "WebKit's Accept header results in web developers choosing between HTTP incorrectness or a bad user experience. Follow the HTTP spec and your users will get XML dumps as demo'd, or do not follow the HTTP spec and roll your own one-off content-negotiation protocol."It is hard to talk about this issue in 140 characters, so here are my thoughts...The naive use of Accept is non-RESTful because it renders external provenance data useless or wrong. For example,Office 2007 Licence, suppose there is a resource, that has a XML representation and a HTML representation. Furthermore, assume the XML representation was authored by Jon and the HTML representation was authored by Jake. Now, suppose I tweet something like the following:"check out out Jon's work @ If you dereference the above URI in Firefox you'll actually be looking at Jake's work. This means I need to send a second piece of state information (almost like a cookie) along with my tweet,Office 2007 Enterprise, like so:"examine out Jon's work @ but first set your browser to applicationxml"Clearly, this is a step backward compared with something like:"investigate out Jon's work @ In fact, the trouble with WebKit's Accept header is not that it is wrong, just that it is unexpected. That is,windows 7 x86, WebKit's behavior is dependent upon a piece of shared state embedded across all WebKit clients and,Office 2010 Pro Plus, furthermore,Office Pro 2007 Key, that shared state is different than the shared state embedded across all Firefox clients. None of this sounds RESTful to me.