In mandate apt rule China , and resolutely contrar

I understand, this post came out,Women's Air Max 1, jump to disadvantageous reproof. But the rule of statute in terms of China had made.
I am well conscious of the seriousness of the judicial administration, in addition to incorrect determination into achieve, injustice, or tin not be changed. Today, beneath the oppression of public opinion, the High Court determined to retrial Yunnan Li circumstance with illegal access to correct the irregular light ahead the ruling. So, Yunnan judge whether the High Court for retrial in line with laws and regulations and the rule of morale?
Yunnan High Court cited Court should re-trial: (c) the elemental decision, ruled that the applicable law is absolutely erroneous. Li Changkui case,Air Max 2003, the facts are clear intentional homicide, the law applicable to non-existent problem, Court of First Instance has given the death sentence. Only in the sentencing court of second instance on a specific amendment, and alteration the death penalty immediately for the reprieve, and the first trial did not veto the facts found and the applicable law.
reprieve High Court ruling in Yunnan is still within the coverage of the statutory sentencing. Any murderer act has decisive statutory sentencing range, the judge dealing with cases in particular, the defendant afterward conviction and sentencing have some option. Death immediately suspended for 2 annuals with the death penalty under the Penal Code of crimes are extremely solemn criminal penalties applicable, and are extremely severe penalties, the trial judge and the defendant does not surpass the seemly criminal law reprieve restrict the sentencing range. Therefore, the sentence reprieve in force by the time the facts are clear, correctly applies the law should not be commuted way retrial.
Some savants have pointed out that the Supreme People's Court In the case of execution, not to cultivate the trial level, etc. mushroom the defendant's sentence. and to deter the death penalty suspended for two years to take the case for review by anybody means reprieve commuted to death immediately. This spirit, the highest judicial organ in China should be commuted to the problem of the opinion of reprieve case, since the second trial and review shall not be changed, then the nuclear complicated has been extra telling decisions can not be changed.
Lee case came to light ashore the network, the Say
himself does not consider herself a , pill case sentencing namely incongruous with alike cases, affect the unity of judge, namely awed by the tribunal of public opinion and Shaanxi Today, I am contrary to retrial Li Changkui, is not namely Lee is not got to, merely oppose the use of illegal manner to draw the so-called retrial. China's long-standing administration of justice Li the case of breach proceedings to compel a retrial, is bound to make this tread at step to deepen the disadvantages.
Li case second example exchanged reprieve, explicit light sentences, judges ought be narrated to deed,Air Max 360, but the force's decision should not be easily exchanged. Like football,Nike Shox Barn, misjudged misjudgment moderator whistle qualifications will be deleted,Men's Air Max 90, but the game has finished, but can not replay.
criminal act is the dispose of existing social narratives. In Li Changkui with violence undermines our society, the ambitious of the court for retrial in violation of procedural law, undermine the rule of law and the way to work, this double harm,Men's Air Max 97, rule of law in China can not afford.