bus companies: No violation
face charges, Public Transport Company in Zhengzhou City, argued: China's other types of disabilities to enjoy preferential treatment by car, and not clearly defined. The Zhengzhou city government has not introduced specific measures.
Court of Justice will be issued for the proposal, policy as soon as possible to persons with disabilities
offer is rejected, people with disabilities sue the bus company
After mediation, the bus company to the plaintiff presented a transportation tariff with 60 yuan commemorative cards, defense lawyers are out $ 1000, and an apology to the plaintiff on behalf of the bus company.
apology gift card bus company closed
Justice Mediation
Wang in order to avoid a similar thing happen again,
designer sunglasses, they will Zhengzhou Municipal People's Government issued justice proposals, the relevant departments as soon as possible detailed implementation provisions to allow people with disabilities receive early implementation of the preferential travel .
core Tips
□ correspondent Han Jingwei correspondent reporter Xujun Wen Wen Zhang spent significantly chart
Wang that he was before 2009, worked in Shanghai and Guangzhou, the survey findings, find these places, as long as holding disabled permits a bus, subway do not have tickets. The Public Transport Company of Zhengzhou City, from March 1, 2009 effective The defendant driver's conduct violated the legal rights of persons with disabilities.
viewpoints
Wang that the driver's behavior hurt his dignity. To seek explanation, Wang successfully sued the bus company,
"tory burch sale handbags ", a refund of one dollar ticket, to his apology and compensation for mental damages of $ 10,000.
yesterday morning, formally Zhengzhou High-tech district court hearing the case.
after the trial, the judge conducted a mediation of the original defendants. Wang accused bus drivers face the language of the misconduct, defense lawyers said in court: the individual's name on behalf of the bus company, the bus driver's attitude hurt the parties expressed regret. Settled the case for a harmonious,
jordans for cheap,
Four men with an iron crowbar theft of car tires cut through the wall, lawyers gave out 1,000 yuan, Wang said this is bus companies provide reasonable suggestions for the recognition. The Public Transport Company of Zhengzhou City, then took out a commemorative, Wang presented to court, hoping Wang continue to support the cause of Zhengzhou city bus.
According to Wang said: December 26, he and his classmates by BRT buses to return with Disabilities Education Rehabilitation Centre. I heard that they disabled the car can not buy a ticket, so Wang presented to the driver level on the disabled card, but the driver insisted that: Wang to buy tickets,
christian louboutin outlet, and has been not to launch a car. To avoid affecting the others ride, Wang had to buy a ticket.
yesterday morning, Zhengzhou High-tech district court hearing the case. After mediation, the bus company to the plaintiff presented a transportation tariff with 60 yuan commemorative cards, defense lawyers are out $ 1000, and an apology to the plaintiff on behalf of the bus company.
event playback
small Wang was born in 1989, students with disabilities Education and Rehabilitation Center, lower limbs since childhood disability.
Wang is a physically disabled student, he was disabled permit holders BRT bus in Zhengzhou by car, the driver was told not to enjoy the rides. Angrily, he will Zhengzhou Public Transport Company to court. He said many places in the country can be free, why not in Zhengzhou?
the face of transportation companies and sincere attitude, Amy finally accepted the mediation. Wang said the court,
"ferragamo suede loafers ", he was not for the money, but to give bus companies recognize these problems and to solve the problem.
judge Lijian Tao said: In China, the law gives the disabled a number of social and material assistance, such as social welfare, social relief, social special care rights. However, in the province, people with disabilities to use public transport, but no specific policies.
court debate