No offers disabled
subway subway, said the plaintiff claims over 5 million less than favorable conditions
Metro paragraph 7 yuan to pay half,
coach sneakers, or 3.5 yuan, 50,000 yuan compensation for mental damages.
Defendant: The Corporation provides concessions range of severe residence in Guangzhou (including primary, secondary limbs, vision, hearing and speech, intellectual, spiritual, multiple, integrated) with disabilities, while the defendant is a three disability benefits does not take the subway. Zhu Jian physically disabled people sued yesterday in the case of Guangzhou Metro Yuexiu district court. He believes that the Guangzhou Metro is not in accordance with national laws and regulations and government work,
coach purses, but in accordance with internal regulations,
coach outlet, grading and treatment of persons with disabilities, and he sued for compensation in half-fare subway and 5 million for mental anguish.
plaintiff claims 5 million
25-year-old three physically disabled people come to Guangzhou,
coach sunglasses, Heyuan Zhu built from years of living. Last year at 14:00 on August 28th, he plans to take the Metro Line from Panyu Shiqiao to Tianhe Bus Station, asking for the concessions were rejected. Guangzhou Metro Corporation for regulations, three people with disabilities did not take the subway concession, and only one, two only take the offer.
Later, Zhu Jian believes that the provisions of relevant laws and regulations are clearly disabled to use public transport can offer, so he would Guangzhou Metro Corporation to court to require restitution or compensation has been referred to paragraph 7 yuan subway half that is 3.5 yuan, 50,000 yuan compensation for mental damages. Yesterday afternoon, the case in Yuexiu District Court.
in court,
coach handbags outlet, the attorney said Zhu Jian, the Guangzhou Metro Corporation was concessionary fares for the disabled to the regular hospital for psychiatric treatment, and also issued a issued by the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen's diagnostic report.
Metro said work according to rules
In this regard, the Corporation's counsel responded that, in accordance with the Communications Commission of Guangzhou City, developed by the , At the same time, the Corporation's counsel told the court that the video was shown from the construction and interpretation of Zhu, Metro staff is always smiling, be polite, patient explanations, there is no This dispute should be based on the contract of carriage fare disputes, rather than violations of the right of personality disputes.
trial ended, the plaintiff Zhu Jian side expressed its willingness to accept mediation, but the Corporation is not a party position.