Keeping it Simple- the Subject-verb--MBT -hermes c

Keeping it Simple: the Subject-verb-object Structure
Clear writing, direct writing, simple writing, economical writing, easy-to-understand writing. All these phrases design,0 the same thing, and they have one purpose—Help the reader to understand what you are writing. Their opposites are fuzzy writing, confusing writing, cumbersome writing, complicated writing, and hard-to-understand writing.
How do we produce the first type of writing and avoid the second? This is the answer that many writers have asked. They query this question because they concern whether or not their readers understand them. Most folk who employ editors are seeking help with this exact problem.
At Precise Edit, we have a powerful, already simple, strategy for producing clear writing that is superior to all other strategies: use the Subject-Verb-Object sentence structure.
1. Identifying the Subject, Verb, and Object
First, let's define our terms. Then we will examine how this strategy works.
Subjects: The subject of the sentence is the "doer" of the main action. Subjects come in two flavors. The grammatical subject is the word in the subject's area in a sentence. The rhetorical subject is the person, place, thing, or view,0 that the sentence is about. This distinction is fussy to producing clear writing. Let's take a look at an sample to see how the grammatical subject differs from the rhetorical subject.
“A important element of the strategy is simplifying that which is difficult.”
In this example, "element" is the grammatical subject. This word is in the subject's place in the sentence, followed by the verb "is." However, we ask the question, "What is this sentence actually about?" The reply,0 is "simplifying." Therefore, the rhetorical subject is "simplifying."
You may have placarded that this sentence does, absolutely, follow the Subject-Verb-Object structure. The problem with this sentence, however, is that the grammatical subject and the rhetorical subject are not the same. We want only one subject, i.e., the grammatical subject and the rhetorical subject should be the same. When we put the rhetorical subject in the place of the grammatical subject, we acquire,0,
"Simplifying the difficult is a major element of the strategy."
Verbs: A sentence may have several verbs. The verb in the "verb's place" retinue the subject is generally the main verb upon which the repose of the sentence hangs. The main action in a sentence is shrieked the rhetorical action. The main verb and the rhetorical action may not be the same. Generally, when we are trying to identify the rhetorical subject, we first must identify the rhetorical action.
Objects: The object of a sentence is the receiver of the action or the person, place, thing, or idea upon which the rhetorical subject doings. Not all sentences have an object.
Let's look at an example and identify these parts.
"John sent a bouquet of flowers to Mary to surprise her on her birthday."
Verbs: This example has two verbs, "send" and "wonder," but the rhetorical action is "sent." In this sentence, "sent" is both the grammatical verb and the rhetorical subject.
Subject: The "doer" of the rhetorical action is John, so "John" is the rhetorical subject. In this case, "John" is also the grammatical subject.
Object: What did John bring? The action is performed on "wreath," so "bouquet" is the object. Everything else in this sentence provides annexed description or elaboration above the basic idea of the sentence: "John sent a bouquet."
Here, we can easily see that this sentence uses the subject-verb-object structure.
(For those who REALLY like grammar, notice that the direct object, "bouquet of flowers," is placed before the prepositional phrase "to Mary" instead of using the oblique object "Mary." If we use the indirect object, the sentence will read, "John sent Mary a bouquet of flowers to surprise her on her birthday." By using the indirect object, the simple manner of the sentence seems to be "John sent Mary." This may momentarily disturb the reader until he reads the rest of the sentence and diagrams out that John did not send Mary elsewhere but sent something to Mary.)
2. Using S + V + O to Simplify Complex Sentences
Our formula as explicit sentences is S + V + O, but, really, the inflated version of this structure is Rhetorical Subject + Rhetorical Action + Object. When a sentence follows this structure, complicated ideas can be presented apparently and simply. Also, based ashore the on conceptions, the grammatical subject should be the rhetorical subject, and the main verb should be the rhetorical movement.
Let's examine a sentence that does no follow these guidelines and then see how applying these concepts aid clarify the sentence.
"Avoiding ambiguity is a task that many writers find hard to accomplish."
This poor sentence has the following elements:
?Grammatical subject: "Avoiding paradox"
?Rhetorical subject: "writers"
?Main verb: "is"
?Rhetorical action: "find"
?Object: none, though the phrase "that many writers find hard to accomplish" is in the object position. However, the object of the rhetorical action is "Avoiding ambiguity," which is currently in the subject position. (What a mess!)
Now let's apply our formula and see if the outcome is any better. Again, the formula is Rhetorical Subject + Rhetorical Action + Object.
We want our revised sentence to have the following elements:
?Rhetorical AND grammatical subject: "writers"
?Rhetorical action AND main verb: "find"
?Object: "avoiding ambiguity"
Putting these together, we have "Writers" + "find" + "avoiding ambiguity." When we add the descriptors and elaboration, the result is:
"Writers find avoiding ambiguity a hard task to accomplish."
After applying the formula, this revised sentence is more straight and clear.
3. Economical and Efficient Writing
(Feeling a bit overwhelmed? Skip this segment. It is off-topic, although potentially useful to those who ambition to dig deeper into the issue of frugal and efficient writing.)
Let’s take variant look at the sentence: "Writers find avoiding ambiguity a hard mission to accomplish."
To use my Aunt Irene's favorite word, Precise Edit's editors are fussy. We can denounce even this clear sentence to detect whether or not we can make it simpler and clearer. We find that we can.
Performing a task implies accomplishing someone or attempting to accomplish some result, so "to accomplish" can be removed. This gives us "Writers find avoiding ambiguity hard."
This sentence is still not good ample, especially if we, too, are trying to avoid ambiguous writing. "Hard" has multiple meanings, including "Not accessible ziped" and "difficult." In this sentence, "hard" refers to "difficult," so we'll use that word. Now we have "Writers find avoiding ambiguity difficult."
Looking a bit deeper, we find another issue to residence. "Writers" implies writing, and "avoiding ambiguity" refers to the writing that writers generate. Thus,hermes new bag, two parts of this sentence refer to writing, which is one too many. The sentence really isn't about writers; it's about writing. The rhetorical subject is "writing," or, in this case, "ambiguous writing." We can clear the new subject, "writers," and place "writing" in the subject's place. Now we have "Ambiguous writing is difficult to avoid."
(Note: We could also suppose namely the sentence namely about “avoiding,” in which circumstance we could use “avoiding ambiguous writing” like,0 the rhetorical subject. This would give us “Avoiding doubtful book is laborious.”)
Finally, we attempt to use affirmative statements. Instead of the negate term "ambiguous writing," we want to jot about "clear writing," alternatively "writing clearly." What is clear writing? Difficult. After whole,0 these changes, we are in the end,0 left with "Writing clearly is difficult."
Let's look at the development of this sentence:
1.Avoiding ambiguity is a task that many writers find hard to accomplish.
2.Writers find avoiding ambiguity a hard task to accomplish.
3.Writers find avoiding ambiguity hard.
4.Writers find averting ambiguity difficult.
5.Ambiguous writing is difficult to avoid. / Avoiding ambiguous writing is difficult.
6.Writing clearly is difficult.
4. S + V + O in Action
Let's examine another example to see how this simple formula helps clarify complicated sentences.
"John was the man, not me, to my dismay, preferred by Mary when she examined her choices of suitors."
You {can|be able apt,0} fight your course via this sentence apt understand its signification. Or we can use the S + V + O structure to mend this sentence so you won’t must. First, let's nail the units.
?Grammatical subject: "John"
?Rhetorical subject: "Mary"
?Main verb: "was"
?Rhetorical action: “preferred”
?Object: none, though the phrase "while,0 she surveyed her choices of suitors" is in the object location. The object of the rhetorical action "preferred" is "John," which is in the subject position. (What a mess!)
We want our revised sentence to have the following elements:
?Rhetorical AND grammatical subject: "Mary" (or “she”)
?Rhetorical action AND main verb: "preferred"
?Object: "John"
Putting these together, we have "Mary/she" + "preferred" + "John." When we add the descriptors and elaboration, one result is:
"When Mary examined her choices of suitors, she preferred John, to my consternation."
5. Three Final Tips for Using the S + V + O Sentence Structure
Let me show you one actually poor sentence, give you the ultimate 3 tips for using this sentence structure, then show how these 3 tips can clarify intricate writing.
"The old man, who had been sitting at the same settle for as many years as I could remember, never speaking, all watching the cars as they raced by, read his newspaper."
To revise this sentence,kso discount, we absence to give you three extra chips of advice:
1.Keep the subject, verb, and object close together.
2.Keep the subject-verb-object combinations separate.
3.Limit the number of subject-verb-object combinations in a sentence.
The main subject, verb, and object in this sentence are "man," "read," and "newspaper," respectively. However, this sentence also has the subject-verb combinations "who had been sitting," "I could remember," and "they raced." "They raced" serves as the object to "watching,mbt outlet," which is not the main action of the sentence. Finally, this sentence has two verbs that relate to the man but that are not chapter of the main verb: "speaking" and "watching."
The most important combination is, apparently, the main subject, the main verb, and the main object: "The age man read his newspaper." We'll start with that one and increase the drifting verb "sitting," which he is act as,0 reading. This gives us: "The old man sat reading his newspaper."
What else do we know about the man? "He had sat there silently watching the cars go at." (Note: We changed "never speaking" to the adverb "silently," which manner the same thing and removes the unassociated verb "speaking.") Finally, we'll use the combination that tells when he has sat there: "For as many annuals as I could remember...."
Putting all these together, the revised version is as with:
"The old man sat on the bench reading his newspaper. For as many years as I could remember, he had sat there silently watching the cars race by."
Why is this better? First, the 2 current sentences keep the subject-verb-object combinations tight. The first sentence has "Man sat reading weekly." The introductory phrase in the second sentence has "I could memorize." The chief proviso of the second sentence uses "He had sat seeing the cars." Very few words are interspersed among these expressions.
Second, diverse the elemental version, the S + V + O combinations are separate.
Third, the digit of S + V + O combinations are restricted in every,0 sentence. The first sentence only has one, and the second sentence only has two.
6. Summary
At Precise Edit, our maximum important amending technique is to create the S + V + O sentence structure. We deem that you ambition find it similarly serviceable. Since this story is a bit long, we'll depart you with a fast summary of anything above. If you can apply these ideas, your writing will be clearer.
Use the S + V + O sentence structure. All following ideas spring from this one.
1.The grammatical subject and the rhetorical subject should be the same.
2.The main verb and the rhetorical action should be the same.
3.Keep the subject, verb, and object close together.
4.Keep the subject-verb-object fusions detach.
5.Limit the number of S + V + O combinations in a sentence.
Vibram is still known around the world as the undisputed leader in soling technology for a wide range of quality performance footwear products. Vibram manufactures more than 34 million soles annually for more than 1,000 premium footwear brands worldwide. The Birkin bag is a handmade purse by Hermes and named after actress and singer Jane Birkin. The bag is a symbol of wealth due to its high price and elusiveness to the public.Its prices range from $9,000 to $150,000. Costs escalate according to the type of materials. The bags are distributed to Hermès boutiques on unpredictable schedules and in limited quantities, creating scarcity and, intended or unintended, exclusivity. http://www.hermesforsales.com. Vibram S.p.A. is an Italian company based in Albizzate that both manufactures and licenses the production of Vibram-branded rubber outsoles for footwear. www.vibramsbuy.com These soles were first used on mountaineering boots.www.vibramsbuy.com
MBT (Masai Barefoot Technology) was born in 1996 when we discovered that natural instability can have positive effects on the human body. We made this discovery by observing the wonderfully agile Masai people walking barefoot on natural, uneven ground. Seeing these people in action made us realize that the human body is simply not designed to walk or stand on the hard, flat surfaces of modern society. mbt shoes So we set out to develop a new kind of footwear, one that would mimic walking on soft, uneven ground. Tod's Group is an Italian company which produces shoes and other leather goods, and is presided over by businessman Diego Della Valle. It is most famous for its driving shoes.


Adam Lambert Im Gay! Rolling Ston-MBT -tod's sanda

hermes birkin sack because sale|Golfers are put apt the test in UK_2336 vibram

Discount MBT shoes are healthy tory burch heel-MBT -five fingers for sale,0