| Back to logs list
Reprinted from 27973077 at 16:32 on October 9, 2008 Reading (loading. ..) Comments (1) Classification: Sharing
9.20 further away from us, the note will condemning candidates also gradually smaller, but plugging in my heart of stone has become increasingly heavy.
true proposition as a certified public accountant members of the group of experts, we have been scolded enough preparation, we are very thick skinned. Who expect to use them if we drown the saliva, then he certainly seems naive. Because we all know, what kind of CPA examination exam, the relationship between the fate of thousands of people, those who did not pass the exam out of the air over our heads, though unreasonable, but can imagine. So we must be prepared for plenty of scolding, and worked hard nerve thickening basic skills. But the face of the condemnation of many sound, ask ourselves, do we really calm mind? Proposition means that we really should not be above board? When one day out of the crowd in the streets, a few note candidates could beat us when the report do we really think this is a group of insane responsibility of neuropathy and not yourself? Are we really just hope our photos will not be posted and avoid the fate of being beaten? Maybe some experts have reached a pinnacle in cultivation, rather than curse endless anger, violence hit plus body without panic. But I believe I have not reach that high state, I Fengyun trembling heart always made me sleepless nights, days without security, or so I speak out now. Hopefully, some of the candidates have to be so makes their senses, I hope so too will further reduce the number of the Chinese Fan Jin, hopefully get my mind will get ugly God's forgiveness.
Whenever I see a Certified Public Accountant exam, some people began to prepare for the next round of study, I admire their spirit of learning, but also laugh their naive: Yes, ah, the world is there How many candidates can really recognize that this examination of insider? How many candidates are not holding to pay in return, a genius from the tenets of hard work to look to their own hard work, their sweat, their sacrifice to win 60 points to Japan! University can be admitted, students can test, intermediate door to door 80 and over, will test injection, I had heard that difficult, but as long as we pay, and will test not in the past? I tell you, there is no hard to learn, there is no solid strength is definitely not the last test; but hard to learn, and there is absolutely a solid strength is not equal to a certain examinations in the past! In fact most of the candidates that test is not meant to last forever. They think they try hard enough,
mulberry handbags, thinking that they are not smart enough, think you there are too many mistakes, in fact, they do not see nature. What is the nature
? Tell you, when our proposition to you is simply not prepared to consider the past. Pondered what, I believe that some candidates will understand the situation. Oh, no wonder how a paper title was, no matter how large are endless, so no wonder how hard of a question paper, no wonder how the question papers of a less biased, in fact, more than that. Now I will be that we used to resort to a brief introduction:
we all know that our guiding principle - guaranteed to pass the exam no more than a percentage of the number of references, it is easy to know our trick . (We really difficult for Na, because the true level of the current candidates, the pass rate may be as high as 50% or more, do not take firm and decisive and effective measures, we will lose their jobs to drop brand!)
Trick one, to hard to win. Difficult to what extent? Difficult to almost all of the candidates are not made within the stipulated time. And the fraction of such a large problem, there are always two or three very right. You think about minus 100 points or three questions is, does that mean? I can also tell you that in fact those of an objective that is difficult to get points, such as multiple choice, you have a point is difficult, but very easy to get zero. There are down points determine the topic. I just need to work this problem can we actually be able to get the score down to 70 points, and bring in 70 points in 60 minutes, not many people can do it.
trick two, a lot of tricky question. Note the review will be a very short time, we all know we should pay attention focus. What is the point? Not your tutors have the final say, we have the final say. We will be biased to extend beyond the material, beyond the guidelines, despite the big skill you can not guess. It also can tell you that we have already noted the rapid development of distance education now,
miu miu handbags, some teachers have already achieved our objective constitutes a serious threat, we have to take corresponding countermeasures. We note that the Central University of Finance and a young man, was touted as the first person of Chinese economic law, you know what it's like our hearts it? This age we should be academic celebrities, right? Who glorified not what we are the first people? A young man became the first person to Mao? If all the words out as he did (according to statistics reported to him in remedial classes beyond the 50% pass rate, which is simply a scourge!), How do we control the pass rate? We will not always be grass is always greener, we will also unconventional, people can no longer be free to our questions can guess it! We can look at this year's tax law and financial management of economic law, is not all that's new compulsory and does not appear?
trick three, order to win. This is the easiest way, everyone can approach. Of course, we can not absolutely guarantee that all people are endless, but we can be a very high degree of reliability, such as the trustworthiness of 95% over 90% of reasonable assurance that candidates absolutely can not be completed within the time prescribed exam, 90 % of the candidates, however hard, always to carry out an assignment when the bell started, will find they have a two or three very question has not yet started. We, after careful calculation, is to allow us to do a question for the experts themselves, with the fastest writing speed, but also to leave a two or three very big issue. Do not guarantee that control how the passing rate?
trick four, man-made answers to questions or wrong. We may notice, papers will be some errors. Of course, we do not deny that because of his limited, there will be some errors. But I can tell you, when you find errors, do not take it for granted that our level of these experts do not as you! So we intentionally engage in, or a purpose, the absolute lower your score, in order to achieve the purpose of let you pass. You can look at 04 years of financial management of the first calculation problems, the issue of sustainable growth rate, calculated with different conclusions will be the same? You can look at the 2001 tax law, the consumption tax question, their answer is correct? 2005 audit, we intend to trial balance will be audited balance sheet equity goes out into the number of borrowers and found that this error is a typographical error in thought. However, we firmly believe that this error are few, we can come to man by virtue of adjusting scores.
trick five ambiguous. We must have a deep feeling that is relatively more we scolded. But I tell you, we like the title, because the subject theory of the past, we have to consider your professional ability to judge the actual occupation of a large number of professional judgments can not be separated. More important is the subject of the most convenient way we adjust the scores of people, we have different answers to a question, which answer the specific count is correct, the answer depends on our situation.
trick six, full use of your guidance teacher to spread some information. These are the methods commonly used in art of war, we are just signaling the principles of financial management were the use of living. We will worship by your teacher to tell you what may --- not test, so that you will give up because of the tight review, so we can surprise unexpectedly. This can not blame us, we just could not test, and no absolute guarantee, Who you give up reviewing it?
trick seven widespread trap. Should be said that this method is the most should not criticize the move. We are widely used in every door that tactic, especially in financial management subject to tax. See after we finished the reaction of financial management, tax law is quite good, many people believe that this time they will have it! I can tell you, you behave and too naive. What we eat? Are we to forget our ultimate goal? Would be so easy to let you pass a large number? The difficulty is not on the cards you are not on the card the amount you, not to digress on the card you strange questions, so that you pass a large number, how can there be such a good thing? We have arranged enough traps have been sufficient to ensure that 90% could not cross the border.
eight tricks, and if in case we missed, we have a last resort, people adjust the score. Just as I said before, we will be interested in the topic wrong, and made ambiguous, but also adjust the scores for the future are foreshadowed. Can be said that the passing rate in order to achieve control we worked hard, scheming, almost run out of ideas of the. All sorts of candidates you have to suffer abuse, we easy? 04 years of financial management,
prada leather handbags, we test, it was generally well received, some of the Internet screamed Results pass rate? You can see it! Tell you the real pass rate than you see the high, to be sure that some people yelled, yes we have hard and fast over them from the ranks of 60 points total to pull back!
fact, our method can be used much more than that, I can not tell all of you. Talk too much, my colleagues, my boss will look to see who I am! Therefore I do not want to lose my job.
I want to tell you is that the candidates friends, learn to see through the appearance to the essence test, however, is not really what level you do not, but because the person did not intend to question So many people passed in each paper, there are always two or three am, the topic and people are just not going to let you get, so no matter how hard you try, you are very difficult to pass. Test candidates had absolutely powerful (of course, the inherent limitations of internal control, there will be a special part of the way through, this part is the exception),
prada handbags, but play a key role is in addition to the strength of factors other than luck . Exam candidates,
tory burch handbags, however, at least 40% of the strength, but you do not have that luck, you can blame it? Candidates should have a test strength,
tory burch bags, the second to have luck, they account for the entire group should be to pass the exam, 20%, 80% going to curse your luck! (All figures are percentage of my personal estimation, does not mean that the AICPA) Do not put us to become experts in the topic and the scapegoat for your pass! We are human beings, we also need to understand and respect.
if the school is good enough, if just from the clearance point of view, I urge you to secure enough not writing the exam; down the strength of the candidates, please face the reality, if you look lucky enough, or too big can not examination hall, a sense of luck and decided to become the only factor that you could pass!
the same time I would also like to once again advise those who are still struggling for several years hard struggling quagmire friends, do not condemn yourself too much, you have dedicated, and you have no sin, you should not back heavy burden, have to be to the van into the study. Your life should be full of joy, you do not need the endless round of grief.
Linear Mode
