Fall death boy opened the elevator door to the ele

5-year-old Tong Haohao (a pseudonym) fall death Station Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou City, are fine buildings lift the pity, once attracted wide attention. The vast building are fine compensation for relatives of 65 million eventually.
However, the disputes brought before the end of the matter, are fine buildings have been manufacturing elevator company to court, claims 65 million. The case yesterday in Liwan District Court trial, due to complexity of the case proceedings will continue.
text / reporter Hooley

Plaintiff: automatically shut down the elevator floor door failed

by the Jing Jing Mansion is located in Guangzhou City Industrial Co., Ltd. (require the latter to bear the costs of litigation case. Are fine in court that in April 2001, are fine the company purchased next door to the elevator traction-type cargo freight elevators, the elevator company responsible for the installation in buildings are fine. Elevator use, companies are fine companies commissioned by a qualified elevator maintenance, regular inspection in accordance with regulations.
5-year-old child repeatedly opened the elevator door

2009 年 8 月 12 at 11 am, the elevator involved in an accident, caused vast death of the shaft fall. Elevator video data, the vast age of 5 years in the elevator easily four times the normal operation of the elevator door opened, the last open door, vast in the video image disappears, the car door immediately shut itself down.
vast family found that children with the security personnel around but not find, in the elevator shaft of the bottomless pit that vast falling dead. To maintain social stability and to reduce accidents due to this and other losses, are fine company and the vast family mediation agreement is reached, and to pay compensation 65 million.
plaintiff refers to the opening force is too small

are fine the company said after the accident, the Guangzhou Research Institute of Special Electrical and Mechanical Equipment Testing testing found that involved the elevator door device does not automatically turn off layer qualified.
are fine companies that, as the elevator manufacturer, elevator car door opening force of the company knows too small, will endanger the existence of personal and property safety of others an unreasonable risk, but also luck to laissez-faire reasonable danger According to the lift of the video images show vast open the car door and the fourth to leave the car looking for means of escape when the car behind the door itself off immediately, so vast can not return the car. The fall in elevator shaft as a corollary, the elevator, there are many defects are the root cause of the accident.
defendant:

boy's death

had nothing to do

this case is vast in the fine families of all compensation paid by the company After payment to the court specifically mentioned the That the defendant elevator company to become, the court did not deal with negative things, the court devoted to the defense. Elevator's general views as follows: the accident caused the death of vast, with the elevator company does not matter. According to the facts of view, vast bear the main responsibility for their own, are fine bear secondary liability company

reason to lift the company also stated that the elevator has delivered 9 years ago, companies are fine to use, at the time elevator inspection is qualified. Later, the company are fine without the elevator company agreed to hire a third party without the elevator maintenance company, elevator had quality problems, companies should be responsible for the third. Moreover, after the accident, the Guangzhou Municipal Quality and Technical Supervision has to report the accident found themselves bear the main responsibility for vast, are fine companies have secondary responsibility. And are fine with the vast company's own consultation and payment of compensation the families, is without judicial process, the consequences should own, not entitled to recover the elevator company.
However, the elevator company's statement was fine in court are commissioned to refute them one by one attorney. Its counsel, deemed a Although the Quality and Technical Supervision, Guangzhou, made
news playback

vast time of the accident

mother waiting for him

home for dinner

2009 年 8 12, had just come home from Jiangxi Province, Guangzhou vast soon reunite with their parents, alone in the elevator buildings are fine, unfortunately, fall into the elevator shaft death. According to diagnosis description, vast neck, left knee, the back was the ground state, had already lost consciousness, blood pressure, heart rate, breathing lacking.
Undoubtedly, the vast no time to see the elevator will be rushed to the situation,Louis Vuitton Purses, led to their own fall from the fifth floor to the floor immediately killed. The vast death of the mother waiting for him to go home for dinner.