A charge of money management training, the red and black is often the highlight of the game. The company also introduced a variety of training different versions, different focusing of the game, partake players working via a very difficult game, the often prolific, even saying Hu Empowerment feeling. Common experience is: a win-win cooperation, and kindness, tolerance and so ashore. But if understanding this stop, the value of the game, in fact, maximum are a waste.
game told us, equitable cooperation and win-win situation? Revealed in the game, only the depths of human selfishness, contracted, uncooperative, bad faith, feisty, cats and dogs, duplicity? Not only that.
Let's look at the entire process of the game (deserving to the chart of the contents of the different companies, where the criterion version, for example):
staff organization:
group of people will be divided into A, B groups, two groups allowed between the commutes, after internal discussions,
Puma Tour Cat Shoes, the cards to each other after the vote, the cards can only be red and black. To keep separate a correspondent for the other side between the two groups announced the cards, correspondent must confirm the A or B group of the cards after the results valid, in mandate to release the other group the cards.
rules of the game:
1, each of the parties choose their own leader, head of the organization by the vote, the statistics of how many red cards, the digit of black cards, to the access the bulk correspondent reports the results of the election group;
2, the group, at the peak of one abstained, the vote is invalid, the validity of voting by the correspondent to renounce or confirm;
3, scoring rules are It’s about time:
If both sides of the black card, each have 3
If there is one for the red card, the other for the black card, black card is the negative side was 5 points, a red square is 5
If you get both a red card, of a negative 3 points
4, the game have to be five ballots, the second round score × 2, the fourth round score × 3, the ultimate sequel of the rule is: the highest conquer total is divided. (Some training courses company, likewise has two group negotiation necklace, let the two groups to communicate, of lesson, negotiations constantly tin not keep its agree.)
Course of the game:
host announced after the start of the game, team no communication among, but within the group can fully communicate at the same time, the host will not question any questions heaved by participants in the game. Two groups were separated in two session rooms, everyone whack, there are few people volunteered to require that when the head immediately, and then published their referendum manifesto, and finally, self-confidence is often very strong, well-spoken, good people elected.
then began to vote, which is more chaotic process. Few of the rules of the game misty, or even no interest; some immediate comment, was asked selected red cards, it was suggested that selected black cards, at loggerheads. But in the end the voice is usually red prevailed, because their outlook is: either we undergo, or we win huge! While others have elected black huge risk: If the other side of the black, we have the opportunity to score, if the other party choose red, his big loss! More people are two-sided send, if selected also red line, also choose the black line. The crowd began to have arguments, a different point of view want to convince each other, and some people playing a sleep, Landelikuai it all. Like a good blues!
then began a show of hands vote, voting statistics, the result is always wrong, no verification of the original group members first, second, it was cited twice or hand, or do not raise their hands. Confusion, some people began to call for replacement of head, it was considered undemocratic, and threatened to abstain from the process, particularly the dominant voice. Several times after the waiver, we believe that abstention is a waste of time, so unanimous: Do not waiver! Later, people who intend to abstain feel guilty, nor comes anew shouted the. Because games normally begin at night, this time too often already nightly.
soon, to a correspondent, reporting requirements, head of the voting results. This time, head on things that do not clear, talk haltingly, drawing boos. Correspondent said: I announce ineffective the results of your group to vote! Correspondent left, the crowd instantly opened city center, there is reflection on the problem, there are requirements for head, as well as analysis rules of the game, chaotic shambles.
If the head of the clear-headed, noisy enough, but also to retain the situation, or he can take the initiative to Yin had. If the case for head, chaos will be reiterated until there is a strong enough team leader there.
choose red voice gradually rising. Many-sided wag faction, began to tend to choose red. Choose black in upholding, but their voices build up. Group results out: choose red! Finally acknowledged the vote to correspondent, when the results of the first round out of: A group of selected red, B group selected red. The two sides of a negate 3 points.
One amusing result is that if any group of men long, the first round of culling is the result of almost one hundred percent ruddy, and women headed, yet sometimes may be chose dark cards. Of course, if the reporter toss a few more women selected head of the mini chance.
after several rounds of voting process is relatively smooth, the results can be immediately out. I have capable three times in the game, the result appears It’s about time:
the first round of the second round (× 2) third round of the fourth round (× 3) the fifth round of
A Group B Group A Group B Group Group A Group B Group A Group B Group A Group B
red red red red the first black
red red red red second third black
red, black and red, black and red and black black black
their final score is:
first: A group of -2, B -22
second group: A team -10, B group - 20
third: A group of +32, B group -26
which should be noted that the third field of the Group B leader is a very strong woman, she was determined to convince you choose black card, of course, team members because of her firm paid the price to make 50 push-ups, and she made a 100.
I believe the game has gone through these 3 people who will not have the same feelings. For the first game, the fact in the third round of voting, the position is very rewarding, I suggest that we ought actors the black card, so cheat the enemy, even now the other side of the red, we were less losses (because the second round of score to × 2, meantime the fourth round score to × 3), so in the third round, we have to a red card, the other celebration has been misled, this one is most presumable a black card, which is a score, with the effect of the final word!
In the second game, either group governor of the change is virtually a farce, and eventually, along the instructors ruthless rebuke: apt watch how much your aggregate score! How many are you wasting resources, and eventually it is a lose-lose!
thespian third game, it seems that in the fourth round of Group B final touched the A group, they also began a black card, of course, this is the strong stance, because they have the odds in hand.
a lot of people do this game through the night, done a lot of people burst into tears after the game, what sacred games, there is such a traumatic effect? This is just a game it, need it?
life is not a game? But the most essential game of life difference is that we only chance - of life for each of us have only one chance. Game activity is not good, we can start over, we can even change the rules of the game,
Puma Outdoor Shoes, to obtain the results in our prefer, but our life? We have no ability to change any rules, even near the end of the game we will have cause to know the rules of the game and definition, this is how sad and frustrating fact!
Let us reminisce, the game gives us the reflection and inspiration:
a team of team leaders and human
election voting process, it is a human focus on the process unfolds. We can see that some people play, some people silent, some people perplexed. For any leader to waken
When correspondent negative group after the vote, often immediate stir within the group, then group leader if strong enough, he will lose the position, but if the team with too strong, he also led the team into the errors, the third game results illustrate this point.
experienced after the initial disordered state, there are three basic human face clearly, let us close and look at their eyes, their interior world.
the first person to insist on a red card, they represent the depths of human ecology aggressive, attack, selfish and self-oriented. Their slogan is: either win the whole world, or entirely lost, or with the opponent dead! This is very typical gambler mentality. Or, this is the behavior of the wolf.
second, they are gentle and lenient, they hope to distend the mall attach with opponents to effect a win-win. They are logical, but more idealism: what they think their tolerance, harmony, and kindness, we will be able to get the same response to each other, how they know it must be able to win? Their ideal is conditional, they need to live in appropriate surroundings. Or, this is the action of sheep.
third person, who is blind, confused, and they lack the wisdom to differentiate right from wrong, they do not even know what they should be out of cards, they are susceptible to induction, we can say that their idea is basically immature , or, is irresponsible, so they either go with the stream, or no position, or just give up.
Then, in the course of the game, there is causative that is pragmatic, full of wisdom, that know how aggressive they know tolerance, indulgence, also know people who give a timely form? No. Because this is the trap game design, game designers just want to through this game, focus on human exposure to the secluded, black material, at last, everyone is not faultless, has its own blind spots and errors, unfortunately, their do not know.
therefore, focus on exposing human disability, it is the subtleties of game design.
Second, cooperation and communication, offensive and give up, we are mighty and the feeble
when to onset, but when the tolerance? Some people in the opening of the game, like a number of ways to communicate with other members of the group, and finally to reach a win-win situation, but in the end can not do so because: First, the group can not communicate between; the second is the original agreement, it is easy havoc and change. In the beginning of voting, it was suggested that we should take the initiative to faith! Attracted everyone's to blame, honesty has a price! Indeed, a group once the injury soon after becoming aggressive. This is not a microcosm of life, do we? Business once cheated, immediately no longer believe that anyone, including my own parents; be a fool a man wearing cups, wearing cups after the look, feel all of them are horrifying. Besides, we live in a world of asymmetric information,
Puma Jiyu V Wn's Shoes, we want to communicate, but how much we really spent a mind to communicate? Once the penniless communication, we will not give up easily, and we began to think the problem are rooted in each other, because the other side is so unreasonable, unreasonable and ruthless.
It is said that the strong can give the other a black card, because he has the risk tolerance, so weak it? The weak can only wait for the opportunity (when the other side of the black card), or only a lose-lose? Another subtlety of the game design is to design a
in the game, human accessible give up the In the team, occasionally we will not give up easily, because we must think the collective interest. But we look by the outcome of the game rules: winning total is the highest points. In fact, if we adhere to abstain, at fewest we can be So it was that out, but also a kind of wisdom, as the Thirty-Six in the
really strong, we must have strong comprehension that They can lower the diagram, they are humble and cordial, their So strong, they are wrong?
real world prevailed by the strong, will give the weak mechanism set out, and will protect such a mechanism. But the real weak, can not collar this opportunity? Know how to leave, often no longer the weak; and exit of people do not know, is the real need of conservation, but they often do not understand, who can aid got them?
Third, change and change, sagacity and responsibility, commitment and belief
I asked the man to lead the team to defeat the team leader, is what forces you to the end? Why do you absence spared no effort to convince you choose the black card, even after we vote, you are able to withstand the Her faint smile: a responsibility.
is the duty! What a supremely dim and word language!
reflect on our team, how many periods the bravery to withstand pressure, stick to their principles,
Puma Trionfo LO L II, firmly to the goal and not change the target. Because we are also cozy to grant yourself to become amenable, we reasoned that the world is changing, the only constant is change itself, so our goal can be adjusted to change the way, strategies can be rebuilt. Our cause is that people in the battlefield, involuntarily ah.
some time, we insist, hear to any against and critique, we believe that this is right, we are absolutely determined to do it, the end result, perhaps we succeed, maybe failure, how do we to reflect on it? Is it just to say to yourself: this is God, this is some kind of preparation, one-third of the workers, 7 destiny?
If so, do not we mention these words, because everyone knows the utter truth, speak out, and have actually become nonsense. So, what is our guiding principle and not?
first responsibility. As a team leader, we must give up anything for this team. A mama, babies in difficulty when in the often incredible explosion of strength, will emancipate their children, we are celebrating this great motherhood at the same time, think, this power comesintoseffect? Is it not responsibility?
In real life, how much to pay for the team leader, comparable to the mother of the children to pay it? State-owned companies is clearly impossible, because the presidency is appointed by higher authorities, diverse the mother of to children, pregnant woman has experienced afflict, experienced the pain of childbirth once, unlike in the mother's children, as blood interlinked, Heart matched. Some of the leading mobile phone 24 hours a day, and some people think that this is a fastening, only a few people understand, this is responsibility.
emulated by wisdom, is based on the wisdom of responsibility, or is based on the wisdom of the responsibility. At first, we may not be clever, but the responsibility can help us do that; first, we are not strong enough, but also a responsibility to help us do this. Wise direction of the responsibility to avert mistakes we made. Who in each other even after the two red cards adhere to the third round of cards is also a black head, her sense of responsibility commendable, but her wisdom gone? After the cards in the first round, the results of their disadvantage, then they should reflect on strategy, and if the sheep's kindness to adjust the wolf attacks the sheep really lost everything, but the wolf will be everything. I asked her, why do not you choose to abstain? She was speechless.
If we are compliant to sacrifice for the team, then we should leftover no effort to become a team leader or team play an important role, because it was their responsibility to do. Of course, our position in the team, on the one hand depends on our sense of responsibility, and partial depends on our ability. However, if we become a team leader, does not mean we must make an repugnant or defensive tactics, we can also choose to give up, you can also give up the omission, which is our right, ah, why should we give up easily this right?
then think of Zhuge Liang's 6 Ky Son. In the traditional literati's mind, six Ky Son represents a liability, The face of mediocre and incompetent employer, if he really responsible for the prevalent people the world, why did he not replaced? The face of knowing that they are impossible to revive the Central Plains of the war, why he should insist on coming out, until annihilated in battle? This may not have the wisdom and responsibility, but a question of faith. Faith can not be reprehended. Team leader for the faith, he will still make faults, they would be dying, but we can not adore.
four, the game and Nash equilibrium, the ultimate truth of the universe
fact,
Puma Shoes, red and black game from Tucker (Tucker) 1950, proposed a prototype of the outstanding game, This is a complete information static game of a typical case. (So-called complete information game is the game the other parties are fully aware of the game side in entire cases the wastage or gain, but also know what they are in entire cases of wastage or gain.)
Basic speculations Prisoner's Dilemma as follows: The police seized two partners offenders, but the absence of sufficient testify opposition their offenses. As long as there is a conceded criminal, will be able to validation the charges. To get the confession, the police these two criminals were retarded to prevent them form a conspiracy of silence. If they both pleaded not criminal, then they will be sentenced to lesser charges of one annual in prison; if they have one human confessed to their crimes, the frank, instant unlock, without the guilty appeals will be sentenced to 8 years; if they both confessed to their crimes, they will be sentenced to five years in prison each. They can not collude in
and fully rational, below the prelude that everyone must pursue their own interests and not care to maximize the interests of his accomplices, and the other two sides will not believe the spirit of cooperation, the final result, not only achieve their desired results (each sentenced to five years) that they could not flee the The ending is also known as
This article does not in-depth debate of game methodology and Nash equilibrium, because too many ingredients that resolve the results of a game: both sides know the information is complete (one half of the game a lot of people, it is unclear rules); can communicate (one for each group members will detect ways to attempt to discover each other's message); the accession are being complied with (if anyone violated an accord, he is the best interests of earnings earners); both sides are rational (think about who insist on a black card group long bar), and so on. In many games, I was wondered to find that the real
Why? This is a trap game, or the life of the trap?
the basic laws of thermodynamics tells us: We can nor create nor destroy vigor. The energy of the macrocosm is a fixed sum of the beginning and never changed, although energy can nor be created neither be destroyed, but it can be converted from one manner to variant form, this is the first law of thermodynamics. That creature the circumstance, we are not in any way the expense of natural energy? Second law of thermodynamics, when energy is altered from one state to distinct state, we will The discipline is that we lost in the future to do some kind of power for a decisive energy. This is phoned entropy. Entropy is a element of energy, but it can no longer be transformed into deeding, that is, it has no use. In other words, the globe we live day by daytime look no different, even more smart, but it is unavoidable one day toward the dead. When the pacify to one end, re-big bang universe, bring an end to ...again. This is similar to Buddhism, said: into, to live, wrong wind, and this is the truth of the universe. Contemporary science and antique wisdom, was actually surprisingly similar!
once accomplished the ultimate truth of the universe, 1:01 to lose and win, what is the point?
absence to unravel entities, basically there will be no winners in red and black game. No one in this game will feel a real win,
Puma First Round, everyone in the reflection, for his life blind specks and mistakes, as the depths of people lust for the people form of society.
Finally, calculate of Mr. Li met with the mainland in April this year when visiting entrepreneurs, to the four answers, then study time, as the article's end:
1, when we dream of greater success, We have no more hard to arrange?
2, when our dreams convert a leader, we have at the service of humility?
3, we often only want to change others, we know when to change yourself?
4, every day when we criticize others, we know how to do self-reflection?
elemental author: Ren Zhengping
-------------------- ----------------------
This article is reproduced from: the wind in the valley: the game of secret and mysterious averaging red and black
reading space with QQ Email Subscribe ravine of the wind
what is the reading room?