the most stringent in the history of the property market, said the policy would withdraw troops Ming Jin yet? Even if not,
belstaff blouson, looks are a spent force.
conflicting signals from the ministries, chaotic. While about property taxes is a foregone conclusion, while another declared that \Leaked yesterday, there are even more stringent follow-up, solemnly and publicly dismiss today. Macroeconomic policy can not easily exit on to say, is attracting a lot of conjecture, perhaps making the second bottom layer worried about the economy, real estate will soon give up the New Deal?
local government is dragging, half-hearted. Several of his policies enacted, in addition to ass, that is, did not elaborate. Suppress the property market is equal to suppress the local government, cut his meat, how can pain killers?
commercial bank, huh \First, then put down here in the future out of the bad debt, can not blame me dereliction of duty, which is \
developers have a wait and see, there are \Shouted support the central decision mouth, hands and have slowed down the speed of development to take place.
also a few people happy and some unhappy, no room for faint hope that point, there is room but only see the wealth. No price drop here and there the sharp rise in rents, tenants suffer, music of the landlord. How frustrating property owners do not suffer, how ants are dwelling in the life struggle. Residents who have fairly mixed feelings, investors are all-gloom bleak. Since the launch of the New Deal, and real estate-related stocks are low-carbon, and iron and steel, cement, glass, electrical ..., collective green, straight down to 2400 from 3200 index, and not hoped to reach where it is.
no cure ills. How many people in the property market in the interests of entanglement,
outlet belstaff, not at the Chief to suppress child can unlock a move? Interest is not adjusted, from editorial and psychological warfare alone can not fundamentally change the basic pattern of supply and demand, the price of course, remains strong. This principle even the interns are aware, pneumonia caused by fever, not cold baths can be removed.
price first game the central and local interests, one to protect people's livelihood, and the other to the revenue. Poles apart, your next fight, I asked the dark. Up and down different interests, how could remain the same? Mao Zedong in 1958 published \In the planning system monolithic evil, pay attention to incentives, not to mention the interests of a wide range of market economy? See the difference between leaders and led, right? Local financial problems are not resolved, the property will be kidnapped.
liberation of the property market is not difficult to start the tax reform, balance the local budget. In addition, land reform but also on the agenda. Property rights to individual farmers to implement the head of the land into the market free trade, stabilize land prices and property prices,
belstaff sale, a sizeable income to assets of farmers to share more results of the reform. 60 years, 30 years ago by the industrial and agricultural products scissors, depriving farmers to complete the industrialization of the original accumulation of capital required; 30 years after the completion of manufacturing superpower, is still relying on low-cost migrant workers, and collective real name officials under the ownership of cheap land. National unworthy of the farmers it!
not only inconsistent with the central and local interests, the central government is also pursuing its own multiple and often conflicting goals. Suppress prices contribute to social stability? Hard to say, though no room to comfort those who are more spiritual, there is room class and investors have suffered substantial losses. Suppress the growth of house prices is clearly in conflict with Paul, so determined to control housing prices, even sacrificing a few points of GDP at the expense it? Do not forget,
belstaff leather jacket, GDP still attached job yet. Another consequence of falling house prices is the increase in bad debts,
belstaff jackets sale, in the end remains the central foot the bill, who told state-owned banks mostly do.
by multiple interests and multiple objectives decision, the New Deal is not possible in the end, if in the end, who also could not take cheap. Under rational expectations, the parties do anything to see what this is like a tiger's head is behind the hip or the tail. Government ride the tiger, dilemma, fear of loss outweighs the gain takes the plunge, to leave it at the face beneath.
problem? Too much government control, beyond the proper scope, beyond their ability.
market economy, the government can not control prices, because prices guide the allocation of resources of the whole society. Rising prices is the demand signal, to guide companies to increase supply, while suppressing consumer demand, which automatically supply and demand balance. The government take control of prices,
belstaff leather, price no longer reflects the demand and supply situation, manufacturers and consumers will lose the most important source of information, equivalent to cast their eyes, their ears blocked, the result is of course a mismatch of resources .
market economy, who have no control over price, no matter how powerful the government, can not control the market. Stock take control of it? Coal prices take control of it? Vegetables take control of it? Drug price control to live it? Rates take control of it? Even the government oil monopoly market, prices often do not listen. Throughout the ages, only one way to take control of the price - a comprehensive and thorough program of economic, as reform and opening up, as now North Korea.
market economy, the government control the price, thankless, because the price relationship to buy and sell interests of both sides. Do not you see high gasoline prices, consumer Aguirre; low, oil companies complain. To mention the price of coal, power plant protest; drop, mine quit.
price if the naturally formed in the market, the two sides follow the market, a contract signed, no regrets no regrets. Market mechanism is not perfect, we can accept, the distribution of benefits from the objective forces, fair and impartial. Public intervention to change the nature of the game, buyers and sellers will invest resources, public relations, lobbying, bribery, fighting the government in their favor. Therefore, to determine the price to bring the subjective arbitrariness, where's fair to speak of? Government caught in the middle, in fact, very embarrassing, like mice into the air box - two end in disappointment.
Why should not control, not control, not to curry favor with the government still sticks to control it? Dictates their own interests. The protection of both the financial performance of land is the armpit of the pockets. Do not believe you go to count sacked officials, optical media reports out of the Land Bureau, Planning Bureau, there are that many? Notwithstanding the risk of Lok Ma, or insist on pipes, a simple thing to some people beg, since you came up to me, you have a good performance.
drop precipitation Rainbow Light, a reflection of the interests of property prices in Taipei, how a \
the surface of the article Do not do style and no substance, and have time to point it serious thing.