A dictate of money management exercising, the red and black namely constantly the highlight of the game. The enterprise also introduced a kind of training alter versions, alter focusing of the game, participate athletes going via a very laborious game, the often lush, even mentioning Hu Empowerment feeling. Common experience is: a win-win cooperation, and kindness, tolerance and so aboard. But if understanding this stop, the merit of the game, in fact, maximum are a waste.
game told us, just cooperation and win-win situation? Revealed in the game, only the depths of human selfishness, contracted, uncooperative, bad faith, feisty, cats and dogs, duplicity? Not only that.
Let's look at the whole process of the game (deserving to the design of the contents of the different companies, where the standard version, case in point):
staff organization:
group of folk ambition be divided into A, B groups, two groups allowed between the exchanges, later internal discussions, the cards to each additional after the ballot, the cards can merely be ruddy and dark. To keep separate a journalist as the other side among the two groups announced the cards, correspondent have to validation the A alternatively B group of the cards after the results legal, in mandate to loosen the other group the cards.
rules of the game:
1, each of the parties choose their own leader, head of the union by the vote, the statistics of how many red cards, the number of black cards, to the access the bulk correspondent reports the results of the voting group;
2, the group, at a time 1 abstained, the ballot is ineffective, the validity of voting at the correspondent to veto or confirm;
3, scoring rules are as usual:
If both sides of the black card, each have 3
If there is one for the red card, the other for the black card, black card is the negative side was 5 points, a red square is 5
If you get both a red card, of a negative 3 points
4, the game must be five votes, the second round score × 2, the fourth round score × 3, the final outcome of the rule is: the highest win total is divided. (Some education courses company, also has two group consultations necklace, let the two groups to communicate, of course, negotiations often can not keep its promise.)
Course of the game:
host announced after the begin of the game, team no communication between, but among the group can fully communicate in the meantime,
Lacoste Shua Lace Trainers, the host will not reply whichever answers heaved by participants in the game. Two groups were separated in two conference apartments, everyone whack, there are few people volunteered to require that when the head immediately, and then issued their voting manifesto, and finally, self-confidence is often very strong, fluent, nice people picked.
then began to vote, which is more chaotic process. Few of the rules of the game misty, or even no interest; some immediate remark, was queried selected red cards, it was suggested that selected black cards, at loggerheads. But in the end the voice is ordinarily red prevailed, because their outlook is: either we suffer, or we obtain big! While others have elected black big risk: If the other side of the black, we have the opportunity to score, if the other gathering prefer red, his big detriment! More people are two-sided mail, if selected also red line, also choose the black line. The throng began to have controversies, a different point of outlook want to convince each other, and some people playing a nap, Landelikuai it all. Like a good blues!
then began a show of hands vote, voting statistics, the result is all wrong, no verification of the original group members first, second, it was cited double or hand, or do not raise their hands. Confusion, some people began to call for replacement of head, it was considered undemocratic, and threatened to abstain from the process, especially the dominant voice. Several times after the waiver, we believe that abstention is a waste of time, so unanimous: Do not waiver! Later, people who propose to abstain feel guilty, neither comes another hurrahed the. Because games usually begin at night, this time too often yet midnight.
soon,
New Lacoste Trainers High Top, to a correspondent, reporting requirements, head of the voting results. This time, head on things that do not remove, speak haltingly, drawing boos. Correspondent said: I announce invalid the results of your group to vote! Correspondent left, the crowd immediately opened downtown, there is reflection on the problem, there are requirements for head, as well as investigation rules of the game, chaotic muddle.
If the pate of the clear-headed, noisy ample, but also to nourish the situation, or he can take the initiative to Yin had. If the circumstance for head, confusion will be repeated until there is a mighty enough team leader there.
choose red voice gradually rising. Many-sided sway faction, began to tend to choose red. Choose black in upholding, but their voices pile up. Group results out: choose red! Finally acknowledged the vote to correspondent, when the results of the first round out of: A group of selected red, B group selected red. The two sides of a negate 3 points.
One interesting result is that if any group of men long, the first round of culling is the result of almost one hundred percentage red, and women headed, but occasionally may be elected black cards. Of course, if the correspondent dart a few extra women elected head of the little contingency.
after several rounds of voting process is relatively flat, the results can be rapidly out. I have experienced Sanci in the game, there are the results:
the premier round of the second round (× 2) third round of the fourth round (× 3) the fifth round of
A Group B Group A Group B Group Group A Group B Group A Group B Group A Group B
red red red red the first black
red red red red second third black
red, black and red, black and red and black black black
their final score is:
first: A group of -2, B -22
second group: A group -10, B group - 20
third: A group of +32, B group -26
which should be famous that the third field of the Group B leader is a very strong matron, she was assured to convince you choose black card, of course, team members because of her tight paid the price to make 50 push-ups, and she made a 100.
I believe the game has gone through these 3 people who will not have the same feelings. For the first game, the fact in the third round of voting, the situation is very conducive, I suggest that we should hurl the black card, so fool the antagonist, even now the other side of the red, we were fewer losses (because the second round of score to × 2, when the fourth round score to × 3), so in the third round, we must a red card, the other party has been misled, this one is most probable a black card, which is a score, with the effect of the final word!
In the second game, both team leader of the change is almost a farce, and finally, by the teachers ruthless rebuke: to see how much your total score! How much are you wasting resources, and finally it is a lose-lose!
thespian third game, it seems that in the fourth round of Group B final touched the A group, they also began a black card, of course, this is the strong stance, because they have the odds in hand.
a lot of people do this game through the night, done a lot of people burst into tears after the game, what divine games, there is such a traumatic effect? This is just a game it, absence it?
life is not a game? But the most important game of life inconsistency is that we only chance - of life for each of us have only one chance. Game play is not good, we can start over, we can even change the rules of the game, to get the results in our favor, but our life? We have no ability to change any rules, even close the end of the game we will have cause to know the rules of the game and signification, this is how sad and frustrating fact!
Let us recollect, the game gives us the reflection and inspiration:
a team of team leaders and human
election voting process, it is a human focus on the process unfolds. We can look that some people activity, some people silent, some people confused. For any leader to waken
When correspondent negative group after the vote, often immediate stir within the group, then group leader if strong enough, he will lose the position, but if the team with too strong, he also led the team into the errors,
Lacoste Arin Patent Trainers, the third game results illuminate this point.
experienced after the initial muddled state, there are three basic human face clearly, let us near and look at their eyes, their interior world.
the first person to insist on a red card, they represent the depths of human ecology aggressive, attack, selfish and self-oriented. Their slogan is: either win the whole world, or completely lost, or with the competitor dead! This is very typical gambler intellect. Or, this is the behavior of the wolf.
second, they are gentle and tolerant, they wish to distend the market attach with opponents to achieve a win-win. They are rational, but more idealism: what they think their tolerance, harmony, and kindness, we will be able to get the same response to each other, how they know it must be able to win? Their ideal is conditional,
Womens Lacoste Trainers, they need to live in suitable environment. Or, this is the behavior of sheep.
third person, who is blind, confused, and they lack the wisdom to discriminate right from bad, they do not even know what they ought be out of cards, they are susceptible to induction, we can say that their idea is basically immature , or, is irresponsible, so they both go with the flow, or no position, or just give up.
Then, in the way of the game, there is causative that is pragmatic, full of knowledge, that understand how provocative they understand tolerance, indulgence, also know people who give a timely means? No. Because this is the pitfall game design, game designers fair ambition to through this game, converge on person exposure to the hidden, dark material, at last, everybody is not perfect, has its own blind smudges and errors, unfortunately, their do not know.
therefore, focus on exposing human disability, it is the subtleties of game design.
Second, cooperation and communication, aggressive and give up, we are strong and the weak
when to bombard, but while the tolerance? Some people in the opening of the game, like a digit of ways to communicate with other members of the group, and eventually to reach a win-win situation, but in the end can not do so because: First, the group can not communicate between; the second is the aboriginal approval, it is easy destruction and change. In the beginning of voting, it was suggested that we should take the initiative to belief! Attracted everyone's to reproach, integrity has a price! Indeed, a group once the injury soon after agreeable aggressive. This is not a microcosm of life, do we? Business once tricked, now no longer believe that anyone, including my own parents; be a fool a man wearing glasses, wearing cups after the see, feel entire of them are horrifying. Besides, we live in a world of asymmetric message, we want to communicate, but how much we actually spent a mind to communicate? Once the meager communication, we will not give up lightly, and we began to meditation the problem are rooted in each other, because the other side is so unreasonable, unreasonable and merciless.
It is said that the strong can give the other a black card, because he has the risk tolerance, so weak it? The weak can only wait for the chance (when the other side of the black card), or only a lose-lose? Another subtlety of the game design is to design a
in the game, people easily give up the In the team, sometimes we will not give up easily, because we must think the collective interest. But we look at the outcome of the game rules: sub-total is the highest wins. In fact, if we adhere to abstain, at fewest we can be So it was that out, but also a kind of wisdom, as the Thirty-Six in the
really strong, we must have strong comprehension that They can lower the diagram, they are menial and gentle, their So strong, they are wrong?
real world dominated by the strong, will give the weak mechanism set out, and will protect such a mechanism. But the real weak, can not seize this opportunity? Know how to quit, often no longer the weak; and exit of people do not understand, is the real need of protection, but they often do not understand, who can help got them?
Third, change and change, wisdom and responsibility, commitment and faith
I asked the man to guide the team to defeat the team leader, is what forces you to the end? Why do you want spared no effort to convince you choose the black card, even after we vote, you are proficient to withstand the Her faint smile: a responsibility.
is the responsibility! What a supremely dull and word language!
reflect on our team, how many periods the prowess to resist pressure, stick to their principles, firmly to the goal and not alteration the target. Because we are also cozy to allow yourself to chance flexible, our reason is that the earth is changing, the only constant is change itself, so our goal can be adjusted to change the instruction, strategies can be rebuilt. Our reason is that people in the arena, involuntarily ah.
some time, we insist, listen to any opposition and critique, we believe that this is right, we are indeed decided to do it, the end result, maybe we succeed, possibly failure, how do we to reflect on it? Is it just to say to yourself: this is God, this is some kind of preparation, one-third of the workers, seven fate?
If so,
Lacoste Arixia FD Trainers, do not we say these words, because everyone knows the perfect truth, talk out, and have really become rubbish. So, what is our guiding conviction and not?
first duty. As a team leader, we must give up anything for this team. A mom, babies in difficulty when in the often amazing explode of strength, will salvage their children, we are celebrating this excellent motherhood at the same time, think, this power get cracking? Is it not responsibility?
In real life, how much to pay for the team leader, comparative to the mother of the children to pay it? State-owned corporations is apparently impossible, because the leading is designated by higher authorities, diverse the mother of to kid, fertile woman has capable grief, seasoned the grief of childbirth once, unlike in the mother's children, as blood interlinked, Heart matched. Some of the leading mobile phone 24 hours a day, and some people think that this is a fastening, only a few people understand, this is responsibility.
followed by wisdom, is based on the wisdom of responsibility, or is based on the wisdom of the responsibility. At first, we may not be clever, but the responsibility can help us do that; first, we are not strong enough, but also a responsibility to help us do this. Wise direction of the responsibility to shirk errors we made. Who in each other even after the two red cards cling to the third round of cards is also a black head, her sense of responsibility commendable, but her wisdom gone? After the cards in the first round, the results of their drawback, then they should reflect on strategy, and if the sheep's kindness to adjust the wolf attacks the sheep really lost everything, but the wolf will be everything. I asked her, why do not you choose to abstain? She was mute.
If we are compliant to martyrdom for the team, then we should spare no effort to become a team leader or team play an major character,
Womens Lacoste Carnaby Trainers, because it was their responsibility to do. Of course, our position in the team, on the one hand depends on our sense of responsibility, and partial depends on our ability. However, if we become a team leader, does not mean we have to make an offensive or defensive strategy, we can also choose to give up, you can also give up the omission, which is our right, ah, why should we give up easily this right?
then think of Zhuge Liang's six Ky Son. In the orthodox literati's mind, six Ky Son represents a responsibility, The face of mediocre and incompetent foreman, if he really responsible for the general people the world, why did he not replaced? The face of knowing that they are impossible to revive the Central Plains of the battle, why he should insist on coming out, until killed in war? This may not have the wisdom and responsibility, but a question of faith. Faith can not be blamed. Team leader for the faith, he will still make mistakes, they would be dying, but we can not esteem.
four games with the Nash equilibrium of the universe's ultimate truth
fact, red and black game from Tucker (Tucker) 1950, intended a model of the prominent game, This is a complete information static game of a typical case. (So-called complete information game is the game the other parties are fully aware of the game side in all cases the loss or acquisition, but also know what they are in all cases of loss or acquire.)
Basic speculations Prisoner's Dilemma as usual: The police seized two partners culprits, but the lack of ample testify against their crimes. As long as there is a confessed culprit, will be able to confirm the charges. To get the confession, the police these two criminals were detained to discourage them manner a conspiracy of pacify. If they both alleged not guilty, then they will be sentenced to lesser charges of one year in jail; if they have one person conceded to their crimes, the honest, immediate release, without the guilty pleas will be sentenced to 8 years; if they both admitted to their crimes, they will be sentenced to five years in prison each. They can not collude in
and fully logical, below the premise that everyone must pursue their own interests and not care to aggrandize the interests of his accomplices, and the other two sides will not deem the morale of cooperation, the ultimate result, not only accomplish their desired results (each sentenced to five annuals) that they could not run the The ending is also known for
This article does not in-depth discussion of game methodology and Nash balance, because too many ingredients that determine the results of a game: either sides know the information is complete (one half of the game a lot of people, it is illegible rules); can communicate (one for each group members will detect ways to attempt to ascertain each other's information); the agreement are being complied with (if anyone violated an agreement, he is the best interests of proceeds earners); either sides are rational (think approximately who insist on a black card group long bar), and so on. In many games, I was startled to find that the real
Why? This is a trap game, or the life of the trap?
the basic laws of thermodynamics tells us: We can neither create nor break vigor. The vigor of the universe is a fixed sum of the beginning and not changed, although energy can neither be created nor be destroyed, but it can be converted from one form to another form, this is the first law of thermodynamics. That being the case, we are not in any way the expense of natural energy? Second law of thermodynamics, when energy is transformed from one state to different state, we will The discipline is that we lost in the future to do some kind of power for a decisive energy. This is called entropy. Entropy is a element of energy, but it can no longer be altered into acting, that is, it has no use. In other words, the world we live day by day look no different, even more smart, but it is unavoidable one day toward the dead. When the silence to an end, re-big bang universe, bring an end to ...again. This is similar to Buddhism, said: into, to live, wrong wind, and this is the truth of the universe. Contemporary science and archaic wisdom, was actually surprisingly alike!
once fulfilled the ultimate truth of the universe, 1:01 to lose and win, what is the point?
need to explain asset, basically there will be no winners in red and black game. No one in this game will feel a real win, everyone in the reflection, for his life blind spots and errors, as the depths of human desire for the human form of society.
Finally, think of Mr. Li met with the mainland in April this year when visiting entrepreneurs, to the four questions, then study time, as the article's end:
1, when we dream of greater success, We have no more hard to prepare?
2, when our dreams become a leader, we have at the service of humility?
3, we often only want to change others, we know when to change yourself?
4, every daytime when we reprove others, we know how to do self-reflection?
original author: Ren Zhengping
-------------------- ----------------------
This story is reproduced from: the wind in the valley: the game of riddle and mysterious averaging red and black
reading space with QQ Email Subscribe valley of the wind
what is the reading room?
Reproduced the game of riddle and mysterious mean
Linear Mode
