Nike Shox FSM Nike Shoes r | Sports life

i liked the ct that they were so weightless <a href="http://www.cheapnikeairforceones.com/"><strong>nike air force ones</strong></a> and i truly felt that the shock absorbtion was noticible however i felt that the sneaker was very narrow in the toe area. i also felt as if they had to be replaced irly quickly and there was alot of pressure put Nike Shoes reviewon the front of the foot.. Thanks to a partnership we have formed with Road Runner Sports, a retailer with 22 running stores in 8 states, you can now order select shoes and apparel online. href= TARGET=_blank> I have never had a problem with any pair of running shoes I have ever owned–nike, saucony, asics, etc. The nike shock is the worst performing shoe I have ever had on my foot. I ran 7 miles last night and I feel as if I need to go in for knee surgery. My ankles and shins are unbearable. This is nothing more than a shion shoe–it has no role for the training athlete. 14down the tubes. I hope this helps someone from the same mistake.. Report AbuseSubmitted by: trironman, burleson, href= TARGET=_blank> 3 stars I only weigh 140 pounds, so the Shox is too bulky for speedwork, but for long runs it works well. It isnt as stable as some other Nike shoes, but I found the Shox to be a surprisingly capable running shoe if you like a lot of rearfoot cushioning.-Ryan Ogliore/San DiegoThe Shox FSM does not fit me snug enough. It wasnt stable enough for me. The rearfoot shock absorption is great, and the forefoot is cushioned <a href="http://www.cheapnikeairforceones.com/"><strong>air force 1 shoes</strong></a> enough, but it rides like an Oldsmobile: good shocks, loose handling.-Patricia Bauer/East Lansing Responsiveness: Low (the transition from heel to toe isnt as smooth as conventional foam-based midsole) Customer ServiceRSS InternationalAbout Runners WorldAdvertisingPrivacy Rights/Community GuidelinesManage Email Preferences Cushioning: Moderate (forefoot air unit) inPagePrompt position:absolute; 486 top:-40 left:400 solid; border-333399; padding: 0 z-index:500 RodaleRunning TimesKids RunningBicyclingMens HealthWomens HealthPreventionOrganic GardeningFitbie.comSitemap Lab Report: 1 stars Disclaimer Wear-Test Reports: One of the major complaints about all the Shox shoes <a href="http://www.cheapnikeairforceones.com/"><strong>air force one shoes</strong></a> has been a lack of stability at heel-strike for overpronators. This new version of the Shox (the successor to the Shox Ride) attempts to address this by adding greater medial stability to the rearfoot. The second midsole density (for added stability) doesnt do a lot, but the shorter, thicker Shox columns on the medial side do, as they create an effective stability post. Also, the plastic plate that houses the four Shox columns is stiffer on the medial side,Buy Cheap Sport Shoes which adds stability. Note: This is the first Nike Shox shoe to be designated a Bowerman shoe, meaning (in Nike-speak) its a technical running shoe and not just a sthion statement. Bottom Line: The Shox FSM is the first Shox shoe to be stable enough for moderate overpronators, but its still heavy and lacks the smooth heel-to-toe transition of foam-based shoes. Nevertheless, of all the Shox shoes, its most applicable to the widest range of runners. Gender:FemaleShoe Type:StabilitySizes:5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10, 10.5, 11, 12 Midsole Characteristics:Two-density Weight:12 <a href="http://www.am9-pm5.com/guestbook.php"><strong>Jordan Carmelo Anthony Shoes | NIKE&quot;just do it&quot;</strong></a> oz. Essential Technology:Shox Foot Biomechanics:Overpronation Recommended For: Mild overpromators; heel-strikers wiNike Shox FSM Nike Shoes rth normal or low arches; and heavy runners with flat arches who need moderate stability and maximum rearfoot cushioning. Tags: Nike Shoes r