this case, Cho was significantly lower than market price to unreasonable prices for this room, and based on its relationship with Lee, she could not know the true rights holders should be Lee husband and wife, it is not a bona fide third Zhao, Zhao and it should be determined according to the purchase contract signed by Lee is not a valid contract.
property acquired after marriage, couples are often jointly owned property, but purchase of property due to various reasons, often permits registration is only a person's name,
mbt for women, resulting in the registration of real rights of man and human rights of inconsistency. If the conflict between husband and wife,
Employees self-directed money home for the holiday his father 5 million extortion kidnapping, one without selling the property to a third person, the other party after the prosecution requested that the third party to return home. At this point,
karen millen jacket, the law must balance the rights of man and the true interests of a third person, which involves the registration of the principles of Public Credit and the problem of identification of bona fide third.
judge
court, buyers Zhao argued that the house is her 10 million purchase price, the seller Lee clearly inform property owner Zhang knowledge and consent. Zhang now because housing prices go back, fails to integrity.
couple selling more secure with the presence of
judge on the case to remind the buyers in the purchase activities,
ralph lauren Home and family medicine Xin said it, often without a spouse will appear in the case of individual houses for sale, buy a house to themselves in order to avoid the occurrence of disputes should be increased awareness of the law. In front of the house to buy second-hand,
timberland chukka boots, should go to the house where the real estate management department inquiries on property ownership registration information, are matrimonial property for housing, but registered only one case of husband and wife, transfer should require both husband and wife owners the scene and provide a marriage certificate (or other proof of marital relationship), valid ID, one can not attend may request a statement of its present total of property rights, ensure the safety of transactions. J179
Zhang claimed that his wife, May 2003, she and her husband Lee for 10 million purchase price of a residential house in Miyun, and Lee signed a purchase contract on behalf of and for the title certificate. Since 2004, her husband started with a woman living together. For the transfer of jointly owned property, Lee without the knowledge of his wife, in November 2007 the Housing Zhao to live together under the name of his girlfriend's mother. Today, Zhang only to find their homes have been transferred to others, so the husband and Zhao prosecution to the court,
asics kayano black,
MBA 280 new students were sent to the store when the Purchasing Guide, asked to confirm two of the housing sale and purchase agreement signed is invalid, the building property for the husband and wife there.
remind
WASHINGTON (correspondent Zhou Jing reporters Credit Risk Management) husband carrying his wife to common property transfer to the Recently, the court found Miyun buyers who do not belong to bona fide third person,
spikes asics, so the purchase contract.
court that Zhao and Lee said it signed a housing contract for the sale at the time, Zhang knowledge and consent, but did not submit relevant evidence, and Zhang denied, so the Zhao's claim inadmissible. Lee Zhang agreed that action without the common property of husband and wife, Lee's acts are not entitled to sanctions. No right to property transferred to the assignee who, in addition to the assignee for the bona fide third case,
salvatore ferragamo pumps, the owners have the right to recover. Also identified, from 2003 to 2007 house prices in the region has been a marked rise. Zhao involved purchase price of housing to purchase is obviously unreasonable, so it does not belong to bona fide third party. Therefore, Lee and Zhao signed contract for the sale of stock house after the owners not to ratify Zhang's case, the contract is null and void. Accordingly, the court concluded Cho Lee and the housing contract for the sale invalid, the house belonged to the plaintiff and the defendant Zhang Lee in common.
mbt for women Husband did not tell his wife will b
Linear Mode
