Windows Vista has finally began to invest in manufacturing and consumer market shortly, we're lastly in a position to accurately test the brand new running system to be able to realize how their overall performance? in the preliminary assessments, we discovered that although the Vista personal computer hardware specifications seem fairly increased, but to meet Microsoft's Premium Ready configurations (memory, 1GB, graphics card supports DirectX nine, with a minimum of 128MB of devoted graphics memory) laptop or computer, even when using the Aero interface, ought to also be able to operate properly Vista.
producers we'll release RTM (release to manufacturing) Vista Ultimate code specs and set up to a unique utilization of time within the desktop and notebook computer systems, after which performed a sequence of benchmarks checks to answer our efficiency for Vista several significant concerns,
Office Professional Plus 2007 Product Key, the following are our key findings within the exams:
• Vista processing speed is usually slower than XP, but in the dual-core pc processing multi-task significantly faster in XP.
• your laptop or computer ought to have at least 1GB of memory.
• If your personal computer is equipped with discrete graphics and enough memory, use the Aero interface and will not reduce the program speed.
• a 64-bit versions of Vista operating program, applications run slightly slower speed, but can increase the memory capacity to solve this problem.
above conclusion is not our final decision on the Vista efficiency. For example, in November 2006 we're in the testing process, the graphics card company is also the drive to adapt (for example, we decided to give up the game Doom 3 test, the ATI driver does not yet support the Open GL graphics of the game API).
need to be reminded that another point: we use is the result of upgrades, and Vista-compatible beta version of WorldBench 6 the Photoshop and multitasking assessments, and is therefore under XP in WorldBench 5 efficiency test results are not comparable.
Vista and XP duel - speed
for each chapter a new Windows operating system, Microsoft have indicated that their performance has been greatly improved, but require a program of almost every The processor speed is faster than using the previous generation. Our initial test results of Vista seemed a bit complex and a result which shows that the program upgrade is necessary.
Over-all, we tested the application runs about the Vista does appear to be slower. This distinction, within the lower price or older pc hardware configuration is particularly obvious around the show. Two low-end methods we use the personal computer are: The Sempron 3400 + Sempron processor, integrated GeForce 6150 LE graphics card Dell pc program memory shared; another ABS with 3GHz Pentium 4 processor laptop or computer, using the ATI Radeon 9600 ProE graphics card. Photoshop making use of the Vista running program with XP compared to the check, the results were slow out of 23% and 13%. Inside the multi-tasking and games
Notes: 1 All tests are equipped with 1GB of program memory; of Vista's check is based on Windows Vista Supreme Edition (32-bit version). 2 game
somewhat new program in the configuration, the check results become a little more complicated. We use the processor to 2.2GHz Athlon 64 X24200 +, GeForce 7600GS video card is the Polywell personal computer, and is equipped with a 2.4GHz Core 2 E6600 dual-core processor, Radeon X1600 Micro Express graphics card to the pc the same checks. Vista inside the Photoshop check results lag behind the number to 7% to 8%, but the game
Polywell program, the gap between the frame rate reached 25% inside a resolution of 1024 × 768, turn off anti-aliasing (Anti-aliasing) under the 114 per second from XP to Vista in the second decline in 85 frame; the Micro Express computer's decline to 12%. And will be expanded to 2GB of memory immediately after a frame rate of two systems have not been increased. As test and graphics-driven game pretty closely, so as the ATI and nVidia continue to develop more suitable Vista drivers, this situation need to have the ability to be improved.
dual-core difference
but if you have a multi-core processor personal computer system or plan to upgrade, our multitasking check results will definitely give you confidence. Within the test, we run the Windows Media Encoder in the background of a video file compression, whereas front page with the Firefox browser, the utilization of dual-core processor, Polywell and Micro Express to run two computer systems with XP than Vista running program, speed faster, respectively, 29% and 31%, as Microsoft previously described, our tests also show that the brand new operating program than Windows XP, perhaps in the run better at multi-threaded code.