I dream most writers have made the fault of falling in love with one analogy and stretching it way past the wrecking point. A sportswriter I knew long ago worked on for several paragraphs comparing a man’s face to the map of Florida. I understand I’ve committed this felony superfluity of times. In fact,
Juicy Couture outlets, Mickey Kaus once did me the bracing prefer of satirizing some of my worst excesses in one essay in The New Republic that has (I wish) mercifully perished from the archives.
Why am I thinking almost this today? Because Donald J. Boudreaux of George Mason University drove off the precipice this a.m. on the attitude page of the Wall Street Journal. He compares public schools to grocery stores:
Suppose that groceries were supplied in the same way as K-12 teaching. Residents of every shire would disburse taxes above their properties. Nearly half of those tariff revenues would then be spent by administration officials to create and manipulate supermarkets. Each home would be assigned to a particular supermarket along to its family address. And each family would obtain its weekly allotment of groceries—“for free” –from its neighborhood public supermarket.
Kind of amusing. But then he pushes the similarity for what feels like a long time—long ample as the approximation to come individually like Dollar Store flip-flops. I happen to share his elementary outlook that some manner of school alternative would be good for meager families and ultimately agreeable for public schools. But schools are not supermarkets. If they were,
Cheap Juicy Couture, they wouldn’t even exist in our poorest and maximum troubled communities. It’s manifest at the end of Boudreaux’s essay namely he has not tried to purchase groceries in a low-income vicinity.
Topics related articles:
Could Ricardo Sanchez Lead a Louis Vuitton monogra
David Broder Swampland Juicy Couture