Microsoft Office 2007 Professional Should Microsof

What's going to Microsoft do with Microsoft Functions,Microsoft Office 2007 Professional, its low-end desktop workplace suite, aimed at property end users? That’s been an open-ended question, ever since the Functions team was moved under Microsoft Business Division Jeff Raikes almost two years ago. BusinessWeek reported last week that Microsoft has decided to turn Operates into a Web-based suite. (Reuters re-reported that story yesterday.) When I asked Microsoft for confirmation,Microsoft Office 2010 Standard, a Microsoft spokeswoman said that nothing was set in stone regarding Works’ future. Microsoft might turn Works into some kind of low-end Office Live offering,Microsoft Office Pro 2010, she said. It might take components of Operates and make them hosted, subscription-based services. It might make one or more Operates pieces ad-funded downloads. Or it might redo Functions as some kind of ad-funded, shrink-wrapped software program, she said. Regardless of what Microsoft will do with Operates, what should the company do with its entry-level workplace suite? A number of PC makers have offered Operates preloaded on new PCs for some time. Works,Windows 7 Professional Product Key, the retail version of which sells for $49.95, includes a word processor, spreadsheet, calendar,Microsoft Office 2007 Professional, database, project organizer, address book and other features. These aren’t the same programs that are part of Microsoft Workplace, although they are compatible with them. Will Microsoft make more money by continuing to charge PC makers wanting to preload desktop software $10 a copy (or whatever the actual fee for Operates might be) than it would from advertisers interested in being featured on Operates downloads? I’d like to see Microsoft’s spreadsheet (Functions or Excel) analyzing that one…. While some industry watchers believe a Web-based Functions could serve Microsoft well in preempting Google Writely, Google Spreadsheets and/or Google Apps for Your Domain, I’m not so convinced that those Google offerings need preempting. Google is a search-engine company, not an app vendor/hoster. Like Microsoft, Google wants to diversify its revenue base. But so far, it hasn’t managed to do so. So what’s Microsoft’s best plan of action, in regards to works? Turn it into Office Live Functions? Deliver Operates as a free (maybe even Shared Source) downloadable? Integrate components of Operates into the three existing Workplace Live SKUs (due to be launched officially in the coming month or two)? I vote for Option No. 2 (freely downloadable) — but without requiring all the Office Genuine Validation hoops. If Microsoft really does want to provide an office-suite offering for individuals, I think this is the easiest and best way to get the product into their hands. Other opinions?