Xinhua News Agency (Xinhua Wang Yan) cross-border exploitation of mineral plaintiff sued the defendant for damages 5 million, measured by the court, the plaintiff seeks compensation for the amount actually turned a 570-fold surging to 28.51 million yuan; in provinces and municipal court verdict, the defendant company's name actually is wrong; and then handing out the correction issued to the
2005 年 7 9, Dahua County, Yunnan Huaping coal mining companies to cross-border ground, Yan Huaping County will prosecute to the Light Industrial Co., Ltd. Huaping County Court, claims 5 million. Courts to identify the relevant agencies,
tory burch wedge, resulting in,
tory burch flats, the big Chinese company at the end of 2005 to more than 2851 claims per change. The case then move Lijiang City Court hearing, and in November 2006 first instance verdict: Yan light company to stop infringement, compensate Dahua 1662 million yuan. After the second trial by the Yunnan Provincial High Court case, the end of 2007 ruling upheld.
in Lijiang City of Yunnan Provincial High Court and the first or second instance of civil judgments in the name of the accused are The Huaping County,
tory burch shoes, Lijiang City, a certificate issued by Industrial and Commercial Administration believes that: the company legally registered business name this name not be accepted. Company name more
Supreme Court case eventually attracted the attention, and transferred the files to be reviewed.
been transferred in volume,
tory burch flip flop, the strange thing happening again: for the correction of clerical error on the verdict, Yunnan Provincial High Court on April 27, 2009 to make this way: Judgement, the text on a clerical error should be corrected, is determined as follows: 'Yan Huaping County Light Industrial Co.,
tory burch wedges, Ltd.' should Yan Light Industrial Co., Ltd. Huaping County. hundred words or so ruling, it found another error: The first mention of Huaping County Yan Light Industrial Co., Ltd., the book contains statements given as