Windows 7 Download Ballmer Testers didn't ring Vi

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has performed his preferred more than the past year-plus to attempt to dampen expectations about Windows 7. He;s doing it once more this week throughout his pre-launch European tour, telling press, analysts and other people there that he doesn;t expect Windows 7 to present a sudden and miraculous boost to the Pc marketplace.But I;m extra intrigued by a connected comment Ballmer made, as I;ve thought about this rather scenario myself in recent months. Ballmer pointed to Vista as an example that tester feedback may possibly not constantly be the most effective measure with the good results of a new working system release. From an October 7 Bloomberg tale:“;The check feedback (on Windows 7) may be superior, but the test feedback on Vista was great,; Ballmer, 53, mentioned in an interview last week. ‘I am optimistic, however the proof will be within the pudding.;”It feels like a lengthy time ago when testers were assessing the many Longhorn/Vista builds that Microsoft issued both before and after the “reset” in 2004. Before the reset, Microsoft officials heard from testers that there were some deep-seated problems with its next planned version of Windows. As a result,Office 2010 Activation Key, the Windows team went back towards the drawing board and rejiggered it. Then there were lots much more builds. And finally,Windows 7 Download, within the fall of 2006,Office Pro 2007 Key, Microsoft released Vista to manufacturing.I;ve been trying to recall if there were any early warning signs about the problems Vista had when it first came out. Were there any major outcries from the hundreds of thousands of public and private testers about Vista/Longhorn being bloated; slow to power on and shut down; and including such an onerous number of security prompts that many users would just shut off UAC?The Softies,Office 2007 Product Key, the company;s Computer partners and software vendors all knew that Vista was such a moving target (both feature-wise and date-wise) that it was dangerous and crazy to count on any particular build being final before Microsoft actually RTM;d it. So there were some signs that apps and drivers would likely lag the product substantially.But was there any widespread tester pushback advising Microsoft not to release Vista/Longhorn because it was not ready? I remember hearing/reading some testers saying this, but not enough to create high-level, widespread panic. (There was considerable panic after RTM, but not before.)As a result, I;m left wondering about Vista, as many are/were about the existing financial crisis: Why didn;t anyone inform us sooner of the impending meltdown? Weren;t there warning signs? Where was everybody?A whole lot has changed between the time Microsoft developed/tested/released Vista and when it did the same with Windows 7. The organizational structure and development processes with the Windows unit was overhauled. Testers got fewer, but far more predictable builds with relatively few changes. Pc makers and software vendors were brought into the testing process much earlier.Ballmer is right: The early tester feedback on seven may be good. Those who already have Windows seven installed seem typically happy.Is Ballmer simply trying to keep company watchers; predictions about Windows 7;s good results from spinning out of control? Or is there even one of the most remote chance that Windows seven may not be as beneficial as the early reviews and feedback have indicated? I;m leaning toward the “Ballmer;s just trying to manage expectations” explanation,Office Standard 2007 Key, but I;m curious what you think.