Office Pro Plus 2010 Key JUTLP - vol 2 issue 3a.ht

[standard9755]

back to contents web page
Suitable Acknowledgment? Julianne East
La Trobe University
j.east@latrobe.edu.au
Abstract
The issue in Australian universities about the prevalence of plagiarism has led to your growth of policies about educational integrity and in flip targeted attention within the must inform pupils about how you can avoid plagiarism and just how to properly acknowledge. Teaching college students how to steer clear of plagiarism can look like simple if determined by the idea that plagiarism is copying with no appropriate acknowledgment. This paper evaluations the expression 'proper acknowledgment' inside the educational context and argues that proper acknowledgement could be a make a difference of context and perception. Within this paper forms of plagiarism are reviewed, reasons for pupil plagiarism are thought to be and diverse contexts for acknowledgement and the way these match in with ideas of attribution and originality are reviewed. Remarks from international college students new to Australian academic tradition supply insights and reveal that college students in attempting to grasp the rules of acknowledgment might be perplexed and worried about when and why they really should acknowledge. Introduction
Currently, in Australian universities there exists a serious concentrate on plagiarism. And as plagiarism is claimed to get on the enhance (Le Heron 2001, Park 2003, McCabe 2003, 2004), universities are eager to safeguard their reputations in opposition to negative publicity. As being a result, coverage statements are made and displayed, several of which, in an amusing aside, seem to be unacknowledged copies (Pecorari 2001, p. 242). University lecturers are expected to become far more aware of the presence of plagiarism in students' work, to show students they should reference and to alert pupils they ought to avoid plagiarism. This duty to teach college students about steering clear of plagiarism can look like simple if based on the notion that plagiarism can be a form of cheating through which the copying of another's (or one's individual) operate just isn't acknowledged and also the assumption that you can find common understandings about what and just how to reference. The truth is, these troubles of copying, acknowledgement and referencing will not be easy, and instructing college students how you can steer clear of plagiarism just isn't constantly easy. Bloch (2001, p. 209) explains that:

The integration of formerly printed published texts into a new text is ruled by a set of guidelines, the violation of that is named plagiarism. These principles regarding composing depending on source texts haven't constantly been as clear-cut as many lecturers and college students have assumed, specially regarding instructing about plagiarism.

The specific situation will become more complicated after we consider diverse perceptions in regards to the appropriateness of copying. From the case of university college students who use English as a 2nd language and therefore are new to Australian academic tradition, worries about what to copy, how to copy and how to possess a voice in educational writing make the understandings and instructing of plagiarism even significantly less obvious reduce. These worries were revealed to me when I interviewed 10 international pupils from both Scandinavian and Asian countries and collected on-line discussions from 52 students representing sixteen nations. Some of these students have been quoted on this paper. For these pupils, the boundaries among emulation and plagiarism were not constantly sharply outlined, and a few ended up referencing basically to avoid accusations of plagiarism. Of course referencing is far more than acknowledging a resource for 'ethical' good reasons. With this paper I contend that proper acknowledgement is usually a matter of perception, context, and culture. I get started with the try and define plagiarism by discussing some examples and I assessment why students plagiarise. I then examine contexts for acknowledgement, and how these fit in with concepts of attribution and originality. Finally, I conclude that those who are hoping to master acknowledgement in academic texts are alert towards the concerns bordering plagiarism.
Forms of Plagiarism
Plagiarism can consider several kinds. Probably the most simply recognizable of these is copying someone else's function with no sort of acknowledgement. Not astonishingly the originators of perform may be aggrieved if another person reaps undeserved rewards from their difficult labour. Lecturers can also be aggrieved if a pupil has acquired or attempts to get undeserved gain by copying from another's operate or presenting as authentic earlier submitted operate. Copying one's very own function without having acknowledgment and pretending it to be a first time production is actually a kind of plagiarism.
Often pupils will duplicate chunks of another's function to their text, as well as although there exists acknowledgement it's not created apparent that the words and ideas are not the students'. In yet another kind of plagiarism, students will try and blend with each other another's words with their very own (Wilson 1997). If this is just utilizing the regular academic terms for the specific topic, then this is portion of the process of mastering the language of a discipline, if it can be taking an author's distinctive phrases it turns into plagiarising.
You can find other kinds of plagiarism that are more innovative and therefore are more challenging to detect (Martin 1994). These incorporate a apply, not uncommon in undergraduate composing, of referring to resources which have been cited in a very secondary resource without having acquiring accessed these resources. An example of that is when pupils duplicate quotations which happen to be cited in text publications and after that claim the initial supply rather compared to text book being a reference. In so doing the writer can look like nicely go through and appears to get researched beyond the prescribed text book. One more way writers plagiarise is usually to utilize the references from a text, then neglect to acknowledge using that text as the supply. This lack of acknowledgement denies rightful recognition for the writer who to begin with collected the references and reviewed the literature. Occasionally this can be because the writer wants to be witnessed as having carried out the career of collecting the references; it might also be considered a case of ignoring the original text since none of its ideas ended up used and the referencing technique (particularly the writer date system) isn't going to allow for this kind of a area.
Maybe one of the most controversial for teachers who supply product essays, papers and examples of investigation style, could be the practice of copying the business and framework of another's arguments and investigation. Right here we could see a blurring of the boundaries between studying the best way to do something and generating something which can be not unique. On the most standard stage pupils are taught that an essay has an introduction, system and conclusion; over and above this, students can be offered models demonstrating the components in this construction, too as designs of argument and evidence and vital analysis. Even though following a design might be considered reasonable, not so the act of expedient reproduction by which a writer can take another's work and basically rewords the arguments and proof from that work. That is a case of plagiarism since the collection of concepts, the organization of these ideas and the considering how people suggestions suit collectively has long been the function of an additional. Although it could be argued that the act of rewriting re-creates a thing which might be understood with new which means, it should not be claimed as a thing unique. As Coleman (2004, p. 278) explains, 'even if we concur with all the plagiarist that by putting one thing right into a various context they've modified its that means, it does not adhere to from this they have produced an unique standpoint. Often, what they've accomplished is alleviate on their own of this task'. That is the form of plagiarism which could be tough to detect and affirm,Office Pro Plus 2010 Key, specially inside the situation of qualified and calculating writers. Surely, word matching detection instruments such as Turnitin can be not likely to bring about recognition of this kind of plagiarism if it's the perform of competent paraphrasers.
Some students will plagiarise knowingly; other folks will do it inadvertently (Chanock 2003, Dawson 2004). You'll find also conditions conducive to plagiarism, and there are a number of doable explanations for why students plagiarise. Sometimes pupils may possibly plagiarise since they can and nobody stops them; pupils also might be driven by fear of failure or the pressure to do well (Dawson 2004); they can be ignorant of how they're expected to build knowledge and how to reference, plus they can arrive from academic cultures where copying is an expected studying practice.
An example of the circumstance in which availability of opportunity authorized plagiarism was noted by a student who explained that because his lecturers had not objected towards the copied sentences in his writing jobs he had noticed no reason to alter his apply. These plagiarism would not be tolerated in all topics, and sadly for this student, he's not learning educational citing conventions. It could possibly be that this student's lecturers do not have ample time for you to instruct expertise; probably they do not know how to teach these abilities, or even they're unaware they are receiving plagiarized perform. Provided increased class sizes and function pressure, these conditions could possibly be widespread in Australian universities (Parker 2003).
Students who can not retain up with all the demands of a program, for whatever cause, possibly a weakness in academic abilities or language capabilities, could resort to plagiarism out of desperation. A student, who prior to returning to review had noticed herself as being a qualified skilled having a good deal of responsibility,Windows 7 Home Basic Key, explained why she had as soon as plagiarized. 'My thoughts have been I've to pass it or I will not be able to do other things...the difficulty of the subject was genuinely overwhelming. The lecturer was not too approachable. I didn't really have that support.' Exactly the same pupil also noted that before her lecturers had provided her a guidebook about steering clear of plagiarism, but she had not comprehended why and the way she should acknowledge resources. This student, even though ashamed of her motion, argued that with better instructing she wouldn't have resorted to plagiarism.
Far better instructing in order that students recognize the material and problems in a very certain topic may well lessen aware plagiarism. These instructing could also lead students to become far more than advanced paraphrasers and do far more than regurgitate data,Windows 7 Home Premium, to ensure they're able to replicate and comment on what they are mastering and may build and apply understanding. Nonetheless, pupils may nonetheless not acknowledge in line with the distinct policies of Australian academic tradition. They might be ignorant of what is expected or they may apply a diverse set of understandings. An undergraduate student noted that in China should you are a pupil it really is 'ok to copy an expert's words into your creating [without a reference] since you are using revered assist for your ideas, but this is not acceptable for publishing if you ought to be demonstrating individual findings'. This instance demonstrates that what may possibly be deemed genuine appropriation in a single context is plagiarism in an additional context because it lacks explicit acknowledgement.
Acknowledgment
Like many other universities, La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia has lately created a policy which has driven numerous techniques to educate students about steering clear of plagiarism along with the will need for acknowledgement. This policy defines plagiarism as 'the reproducing of someone else's words, ideas or findings and presenting them as one's personal without having suitable acknowledgement' (La Trobe University, Educational Misconduct Policy). I do not need any argument with this sort of a definition; it would seem perfectly reasonable that one ought to appropriately acknowledge, accepting naturally that what exactly is proper in a single context could be very diverse in another.
Seasoned writers can base the decision to acknowledge around the perception that some resources and a few suggestions have more worth than other people, fairly compared to vital for being sincere. Citing from a prestigious journal lets the reader know that the writer has read this sort of a journal and it is approximately date with all the newest thinking and findings on a subject. Around the other hand, an notion or business of suggestions in an unrefereed text, regardless of how fascinating, is likely to be significantly less authoritative and so carry less bodyweight as proof. By way of example, an email from a chat room is unlikely to carry as significantly fat as verifiable study (Bloch 2004, p. 221), so it's not shocking that such communications will not be always acknowledged. Equally, some writers and researchers carry a lot more authority than other folks.
The truth is, this really is an issue I've been reflecting on in my own educational writing practice, and particularly in writing this paper as the following problem demonstrates. In planning to jot down this paper I deemed that there could be distinct cultural understandings of when, why and just how to attribute, and accordingly I wanted to present proper selected assistance. An illustration of this kind of assist is within the work of Pennycook, a well-respected commentator on English language educational culture. He pointed out the notion of plagiarism 'needs for being comprehended in the certain cultural and historical context of its growth, in addition, it needs for being recognized relative to substitute cultural practices' (Pennycook 1996, p. 218). I could have also utilized other resources, for I've go through such ideas elsewhere, but my preference is for your acclaimed and erudite Pennycook. In fact, I didn't get the notion that plagiarism has distinct cultural contexts from looking at Pennycook; I do not know wherever the thought arrived from, but maybe, the truth is, Pennycook may truly be the original source of the thought. Probably I picked up the idea from conversation or observation or one thing I study somewhere. This sort of resources would hardly be remarkable, and after all what is the stage of making a declare unless it's to become taken critically. In one more instance, I may well select to not acknowledge a source. I study the Lancaster University document 'Cultural Attitudes to Plagiarism: Establishing a better comprehension of the desires of college students from varied cultural backgrounds referring to troubles of plagiarism' (Introna, Hayes,Windows 7 Serial, Blair & Woods 2003) but found no specific items that I desired to utilize for my analysis; however, the bibliography gave me some good references. Need to I give acknowledgement for any good collection of sources? (See Martin 1994, to get a discussion with the different kinds of plagiarism.) I undoubtedly would if Pennycook wrote it. So, fairly than acknowledge in order to avoid plagiarism, I decide on to refer to sources so that my producing is placed inside of a selected discussion. Hunt in his article 'Four Good reasons to become Happy about Internet Plagiarism' (2003, p. 4 of 5) gives a succinct explanation of why scholars acknowledge.

Scholars -- writers generally -- use citations for numerous things: they establish their very own bona fides and currency, they advertise their alliances, they bring function to your attention of their reader, they assert ties of collegiality, they exemplify contending positions or outline nuances of difference among competing theories or suggestions. They do not use them to defend on their own in opposition to potential allegations of plagiarism.

An implication of this really is that novice academic writers will should learn the best way to use citations to their advantage. Their decisions about which texts to use as evidence and which to acknowledge may need to be according to knowing certain contexts. A student new to an existing system of knowledge inside a subject matter will be discovering who and what proof carries weight. This involves dealing with all the huge amount of info now available and deciding which texts and which writers are seen to get valued.
Yet another issue for novice writers attempting to sound appropriately academic will be the acquisition and appropriation of new terminology. Occasionally pupils repeat phrases and terms because they don't have a ready repertoire of synonyms; often they repeat simply because they usually do not yet have the comprehending and expertise for being confident about paraphrasing. A single way that I build my terminology is by working through texts and appropriating terms to my very own creating. Obviously I know that when I meet a unique and newly created phrase or approach I need to acknowledge the resource. The far more familiar I am using a theme the much more confident I am in undertaking this; on the other hand, when I meet new terms in a very new subject matter I am tentative about mining vocabulary. It follows then the greater my exposure to a certain topic the a lot more aware I am of what exactly is commonly utilised and requirements no acknowledgement in contrast to that which might be attributed to an individual and so requires acknowledgement. Or I could say that the a lot more familiar words and terms become, the much less aware I have become of making out their meaning.
Gee (1996, p. 140) points out that when we have mastered a thing we have no consciousness of it, and eventually as Chanock explains: 'We learn to see things the way other people see them, by naming them in the ways that other people name them' (2002, p. 51). Until these time the novice writer could be disadvantaged, which indicates the asymmetry of power in language (Habermas 1987). Using new terminology is one way that novice writers build their vocabulary and try and sound educational; recognising unacknowledged exclusive phrases is a single way that lecturers determine that acts of plagiarism are committed.
There have been times when I've been inspired and checked by the tips and phrases of other folks but haven't necessarily acknowledged these. My colleagues and examine group happen to be a great assistance in my research and as a make any difference of etiquette I can give due acknowledgement for this in a thesis, but I rarely acknowledge this input in other texts. This could possibly be as considerably a shortcoming from the referencing technique as much as anything else. I realized this when making an attempt to find a place on this paper to acknowledge the specifically helpful responses made by a colleague, Elizabeth Burns Coleman. The issue is in relaying a apparent picture from the degree from the input and its effect. Whether acknowledged or not, I consider the input of my colleagues and exposure to their suggestions to become a collaboration vital to my studying approach and professional advancement, and I know that this is not collusion, and further I am comfortable about placing myself because the writer (cf. Myers 1998, p. 9).
Acknowledgement for authorship of and input into a text can vary. Sometimes, language and educational abilities advisers have already been extensively involved in instructing students how to research and the way to put in writing and existing study but have acquired no public acknowledgement, just since the role of editors is often ignored (Scollon 1995, p. 8). In contrast you'll find instances of an author being listed even though this person has had little or no involvement in the composing method. If this 'author' has a prestigious reputation lending a name to a publication is inside the interests of the other listed authors, whose operate may otherwise not be accepted for publication. Understandably such acknowledgement, albeit not a measure of effort yet comprehended by some as valuable, is controversial. La Trobe University has declared this apply of 'Honorary authorship' to become unacceptable (see La Trobe University Guidelines for the Conduct of Research 2003, p. 9).
In some situations and with some university texts it is accepted practice that the author as wordsmith isn't acknowledged. Administrative communications can be composed by a person or persons other compared to named official. I am not alarmed or worried if the message to all staff from the vice-chancellor just isn't personally composed by him (cf. Martin 1994). Even though I expect his direction of and duty for this sort of a task, I do recognize the demands of this sort of a senior role would mean task designation to other individuals, and I usually do not expect individuals other individuals to become acknowledged. My response towards the message to all staff is the vice-chancellor is being the writer. Scollon (1995, p. 7) explains this kind of a perception of authorship by utilizing Goffman's communication categories: the vice-chancellor could possibly be noticed as obtaining the role of standing behind and being responsible for the communication, whilst the person who prepares the communication text is understood to 'animate' the words with the vice-chancellor. Scollon also feedback on this explanation and asks us, as does Martin (1994), to consider that simply because these roles are embedded within the institution these inside the institution might be blind for the rights of people who actually write texts. While this may be so, vice-chancellors could be well-advised to ensure that any writer of their texts has referenced effectively, since it needs to be the vice-chancellor who risks public disgrace from accusations of plagiarism.
Accusations of plagiarism aren't limited towards the university context. Just as senior university staff may well not publish their administrative communications, so politicians employ speech writers. Acknowledgement is rarely presented to speech writers, but then they are doing not wear responsibility for the material and delivery of 'their' speeches. This can outcome in accusations of plagiarism not directed to the person who wrote and sourced the text, but somewhat towards the politician who delivered the text. In April 2004, the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, accused the then Leader of the Opposition, Mark Latham, of stealing concepts and words from President Clinton's 1997 State from the Union address (ABC On the web). Latham, not his speech author, responded to your accusations of plagiarism of Clinton's speech, also no doubt worded by a speech writer.
It may be argued that a person may well not discern that what's appropriate acknowledgement in a single forum isn't applicable in another. In the tradition of Black American oratory, employing another's words, style and structure is legitimate. Tannen (1989) in her evaluation of Jesse Jackson's speech in 1988 towards the Democratic National Convention, showed that significantly of your power of this speech was in its heavy borrowing from Martin Luther King's famous acceptance speech "I Have a Dream" for the Nobel Peace Prize. This 'borrowing' could also be recognized as appropriation of terms that Jackson and his audience had come to believe in. In contrast, even though Jackson's appropriation is acceptable in its oratory genre, it is argued the instances of copied text in King's doctoral thesis lacked acceptable acknowledgement. Responses to this have varied. Scollon (1995) and Martin (1994) have indicated that this could possibly be evidence of distinct cultural traditions, and Moore Howard (1995, p. 793) points out that 'we carry the practices and conventions of one particular community into another'. Randall (2001, pp. 208 - 213) analyses this view from several perceptions, even considering the lack of acknowledgement in King's work amounted to plagiarism which had been tolerated since his supervisors have been racist and had not anticipated more of him.
You will find other scenarios in which what is deemed plagiarism in one community because it lacks acknowledgement may be thought to be acceptable apply in yet another. A law student from Denmark who was confused concerning the referencing requirements in her studies in Australia explained:

Normally, back home it's the argument itself that's important and not the author. So I can use as several arguments from books as I want, with no referencing anything. I do not should use name or web page - I just use the argument. For me that's normal. Sometimes, if there's a good sentence I can duplicate the phrases, I can compose the whole sentence and I don't need to use references at all.

In some cultures there is certainly an expectation that copying is really a understanding strategy.

In my first language, [you] never have the concept of plagiarism, you can duplicate with out acknowledgement. [We] think duplicate others' work is really a good habit for understanding, within this stage, it really is completely different to the concept of plagiarism... Based on the cultural differences [with] Australia, plagiarism makes me feel very confused, it is new for me.

An explanation from one more pupil demonstrates why he perceives that acknowledgement is just not constantly necessary:

... in some Asian countries or few western countries, only [when] the whole article is copied by pupils and utilized as their own can [it] be thought to be as plagiarism, and it really is accepted to use some good sentences or phrases from other reading through material directly due to the fact students need to show that they have go through widely ahead of writing their essays.

Even though these examples assistance the thought that copying and repetition is usually a genuine learning strategy (Biggs 1997), if pupils applied this strategy in an Australian university they may be accused of plagiarism.
Concepts, Originality and Attribution
One way of viewing text creation is with the idea of the author as a producer of private property whose efforts must be acknowledged. Such a perception has credibility when the accordance of reward is based on effort which has created one thing authentic. And as Bloch (2001, p. 211) notes, college students are disinclined to attribute authorship to that which they consider as 'common knowledge' and in the 'public domain', which parallels my previously claim that 'commonly used' terms require no acknowledgement. The problem like a student explained is that, 'sometimes it is difficult to distinguish what may be considered as plagiarism, as there exists no apparent dividing line among general expertise and a person's voice.' One more student was concerned about when an concept became frequent understanding and when acknowledgement was necessary:

We rewrite what we have learned and frequently we use distinct words from the textbook. But the concepts we publish about are still from the textbook...I think I want some more practice in when to work with references, due to the fact also often I ask myself if I should have used one or not. The textbooks can often describe ideas thoroughly when they can be utilised for the very first time. Several of this could be typical sense or knowledge or some thing you just know about. Then you usually do not feel you must acknowledge the textbook. No, it is not easy!

From these students' dilemmas we can learn that acknowledging effort and attributing concepts can be problematic if the divide between what everybody knows and what an individual writer has created just isn't apparent.
An additional limit for the concept that property rights rest with individual creation of text may be the utilization of technology for text generating and sharing. Technology has elevated what on earth is from the public domain and produced it easier to access and plagiarise. I also suggest that this availability along with the variety of texts have manufactured it tougher for the user to envisage the quoting of text as taking someone's property. Bloch citing Kolko (2001, p. 211) asks us to consider how college students may possibly perceive texts around the internet and whether or not all these needs to be cited within the exact same way. Whilst it is obvious that an online educational journal requires formal acknowledgment, would this also be so for information from a site wherever the writer just isn't obvious, say a university page explaining plagiarism? Furthermore, on-line discussions demonstrate the collaborative and derivative improvement of concepts, and so challenge the idea with the individual author producing private property. This notion of proprietorship, however, remains the premise upon which university assessment is primarily based. The conundrum for the pupil author is in knowing the best way to proper what would seem to become publicly available, in order that they will produce texts which will be assessed as if they may be individual creations.
Understandably, some pupils perceive concepts as being individually created with property rights. One from the interviewees explained that whenever she got an notion from other folks she would give some sort of recognition, but she considered it unfair when protocol prevented her from claiming sole authorship of an concept.

... often I feel that what they said is actually my concept too, it's what I feel, but often there We have to do some form of quotation but it's not fair to me also. ...anyway I just want to stick to the rule, not make a big fuss on it so I just give a citation there. That's why I feel it's unfair to me simply because it's my notion as well.

This student, somewhat than seeing her contribution as an evaluation of perceptions of expertise, and the worth of her educational opinions could be enhanced by verification, appears to become imagining concepts as individual productions or discoveries. The pupil describes herself as just following rules, which implies a sense of frustration and also that the need to acknowledge seems 'unfair' to her,Windows 7 X86, which puts her at odds with a number of the causes for citing sources. In accordance with Bloch (2001, p. 221) 'There is also a rhetorical purpose for citing resources. Educational writing particularly relies on a kind of social cohesiveness, what Myers (1985) refers to since the require for writers to demonstrate how their suggestions are connected with what has formerly been claimed.' With no an appreciation of this connectedness, I can see that such a student may well feel that her individual voice are unable to find a place in educational creating.
Some revealed writers also see the attribution of ideas as personally relevant and practise the curious act of self-citation. Obviously, this sort of writers refer to their own previous works and tips to not acknowledge another's 'property' or creation, nor do they constantly reference for that sake of transparency and honesty, somewhat they may be likely to be alerting the reader to your writer's value and place in an existing entire body of information. In fact, as Hyland (2003) argues, self-citation is usually self-promotion. Self-citation, however, will not work in quite exactly the same way for that unpublished author. As an academic expertise adviser We have witnessed a lot of examples of self-copying in students' essays. These include minor examples such as 'reusing' a few sentences and reusing empirical study as well since the a lot more blatant examples of resubmitting entire essays. I am yet to see any illustration of self-attribution inside a student's creating.
It's not difficult to see why college students may be confused by the concept that authorship of the text could be the construction of original ideas. As one pupil protested: 'if one particular thing is told you by your mother, and your mother is told by your grandmother and how can I get the initial? Exactly where does an concept arrive from, it's generation to generation...' Barks and Watts (2001, p. 254) in their chapter advising on the teaching of referencing, declare that because the concept of 'originality' requires discussion they've been 'purposefully vague' in their utilization of the term, which does not leave the reader any the wiser.
In fact, originality in educational text creation does not mean that an writer has created new suggestions only from 'imagination'. Fairly the writer works in an existing entire body of expertise and makes decisions about which concepts and proof to make use of from sources, what could be said about these ideas and so what other perspectives can be brought to this new discussion. Comprehending originality with this way could make the purpose of acknowledgement clearer for those students who are involved about attributing the 'original' supply of an idea.
Contextualising the concept of originality in suggestions as well as the want for attribution as cultural notions could possibly be a way of understanding what new student writers confront. In his examination of your history of Western thought, Pennycook (1996, p. 205) points out that the writer and originality are constructed notions, and by referring to Kearney he explains how imagination, the moment viewed as a reproduction of divine inspiration, in modern western thinking has become the topic of human production. He explains that by medieval times , truth was linked to authenticity which may be verified through the authority of an individual writer. Whilst scientific notions had been to be seen as unauthored 'facts', inside the area of literature, individual creativity was recognized and valued. Pennycook explains that this move to seeing works as individualized and therefore authentic is really a Western cultural perception. Pupils new to Australian academic culture could be trying to kind out these cultural perceptions. They will be working out they should state, in a prescribed way, a supply for certain tips, and that there is certainly a proprietorship of (some) tips which can be taken very seriously by their lecturers.
Conclusion
This paper has touched on the quantity of concerns regarding plagiarism and 'proper' acknowledgement. It is obvious that acknowledgment can have diverse purposes, including attributing to a certain resource to prevent plagiarism. Furthermore the necessity to acknowledge could be context specific. In reflecting on my personal explanations of when I acknowledge and proper I can see that I create as someone who seems comfortable in describing the peculiarities of acknowledgment. By contrast, the responses from the worldwide pupils sometimes reveal a perplexed concern about when and why they should acknowledge. These worries indicate that for newcomers to Australian educational culture, notions of acknowledgement and attributing tips aren't familiar. It could also be that, in attempting to comprehend the rules of academic communication, these pupils are conscious of that which people who are culturally familiar are no longer aware.
These conclusions invite speculation that when students, lecturers along with the university communicate about plagiarism they will arrive towards the conversation with distinct understandings, and they could also leave with differences. I've manufactured few suggestions about how you can improve these communications, but hopefully this provides opportunities for future analysis. I hope that the insights of your students and my discussion will contribute to greater knowledge of the problems confronting college students when they try to appropriately acknowledge.
References
ABC News Online (Last Update: Wednesday April 21, 2004, Posted: 11:05pm). 'Latham accused of stealing speech'.
[Accessed 1 Aug. 2005]

Barks, D & Watts, P 2001, 'Textual Borrowing Strategies for Graduate-Level ESL Writers', in Belcher D & Hirvela A (eds.), Linking literacies: perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, Michigan.

Belcher, D & Hirvela, A 2001, Linking literacies: perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, Michigan.

Biggs, J B 1997, 'Teaching across and within cultures: The issue of international students', Learning and Instructing in Higher Education: Advancing international perspectives: proceedings of the Higher Education Analysis and Growth Society of Australasia Conference, 8-11 July, 1997, Adelaide.

Bloch, J 2001, 'Plagiarism and the ESL Student: From Printed to Electronic Texts', in Belcher D & Hirvela A (eds.), Linking literacies: perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, Michigan.

Chanock, K 2003, 'Before we hang that highwayman - The LAS advisers' perspective on plagiarism', in Marsden, H & Hicks M (eds.), Instructional Integrity: Plagiarism and other perplexities, UniSA, Adelaide.

Coleman, E 2004, 'Some thoughts on plagiarism, forgery and also the nom de plume', in Dobrez, L (ed.), An ABC of Lying, Australian Scholarly Press, Melbourne.

Dawson, J 2004, 'Plagiarism: What's actually going on?', in Teaching and Learning Forum: Seeking Academic Excellence, Murdoch University, Western Australia.

Gee, J 1996, Social linguistics and literacies: ideology in discourses, Falner Press, London.

Habermas, J 1987, Expertise and human interests, Polity Press, Oxford.

Hyland, K 2003, 'Self-Citation and Self-Reference: Credibility and Promotion in Educational Publication', Journal from the American Society for Details Science and Technology, vol. 54, no 3, pp. 251-259.

Hunt, R 2002, Four Causes for being Happy about Internet Plagiarism, St. Thomas University [Online]
[Accessed 1 Aug. 2005].

Introna, L, Hayes, N, Blair, L & Wood, E 2003, Attitudes to Plagiarism: Creating an improved knowledge of the needs of pupils from diverse cultural backgrounds relating to issues of plagiarism, Lancaster University, Lancaster. [Online]
[Accessed 1 Aug. 2005].

La Trobe University Educational Misconduct Policy [Online]
[Accessed 1 Aug. 2005].

La Trobe University Guidelines for that Conduct of Analysis [Online]
[Accessed 1 Aug. 2005].

Le Heron, J 2001, 'Plagiarism, studying dishonesty or just plain cheating: The context and countermeasures in Info Systems teaching', Australian Journal of Instructional Technology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 244-264.

Martin, B 1994, 'Plagiarism: a misplaced emphasis', Journal of Data Ethics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 36-44.

McCabe, D 2004, 'The US and Canadian Experience', Symposium on Promoting Educational Integrity, University of Newcastle NSW.

Moore Howard, R 1995, 'Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty', College English, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 348-355.

Myers, S 1998, 'Questioning Authority: ESL/EFL, science, and instructing about plagiarism', TESL-EJ, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1-15.

Park, C 2003, 'In Other (People's) Words: plagiarism by university college students - literature and lessons', Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 28, no.5, pp. 471-488.

Parker, P 2003, 'In your 'own' phrases: Understanding advisers on student difficulties with keeping away from plagiarism during the transition to university', 7th Pacific Rim 1st Year in Higher Education Conference Proceedings, QUT Brisbane.

Pennycook, A 1996, 'Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism', TESOL Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 201-230.

Randall, M 2001, Pragmatic plagiarism: authorship, profit, and power, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

Scollon, R 1995, 'Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse', Language in Society, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-28.

Tannen, D 1989, Talking Voices, CUB, Cambridge.

Wilson, K 1997, 'Can note-taking solve the plagiphrasing problem?', EA Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43-52
Print
//-->
back to contents page