Dispelling The Myth of Fewer Home Runs_6229

Dispelling The Myth of Fewer Home Runs
For the quondam few annuals, it's been warmhearted accepted namely family escapes scampers in baseball are down significantly thanks apt fashionable punitive amounts by Major League Baseball. The game namely pure now,asics womens, you see,buy sony headphones online, and mini children can deem in their heroes again and it's a Planet Unicorn Christmas and yaaaaaay everyone's elated. Right? Maybe. But just for the unicorns are hitting it doesn't average there are less home runs. Or something. There have been 1.85 home runs per game this season,mbt shop, down 3% from the same time last year, while 1.91 homers a game were being kick,mbt tunisha, along to the Elias Sports Bureau. There are almost as many home runs and runs scored per game (9.00) this year as 2002 (1.95 homers and 9.09 runs) - two years ahead baseball began testing because steroids. When you take into consideration injuries to Alex Rodriguez and slow starts by David Ortiz and Prince Fielder -- where have you gone, Prince? -- that 3% disparity begins to look less and less impressive. Which is to say: there are still a lot of home runs. Either steroids don't do as much for home run slugging as the media likes to muse,best sennheiser headphones, or everyone's still act steroids.

http://www.thefootballjerseys.info/b...ic.156126.html

http://www.alpiner.org/uch/space.php...=blog&id=47693

http://www.lucky-star.net.cn/bbs/uc_...=blog&id=90749


VMy colleague Pat Lackey had some choice words for the WBC when Sizemore withdrew, claiming that not all the players take it seriously, which in turn affects the fans' interest level. And back in December, Matt Snyder took a stab at who would make up our ideal U.S. roster. Now it's time to take a turn at naming which players, like Sizemore, we're going to miss watching in this tournament.