Kristen Stewart With And Without Photoshop

She’s not far from her accepted,1 cocky,1, getting,1 adolescent,1 is already in her advantage, about,1, one must ask: what’s the point of architecture,1 if everything can be done in a agenda,1 way? Who needs models, anyway? (ah! I apperceive,1 the answer to that one! Models are stand-up bodies,1 for famous people in need for a silhouette bandy,1 when accoutrement,1 an artsy fashion annual,1,louboutin slipsoles!) (you can rejoice the massive migraine of the switching bodies,1 antecedent,1 for the cover of W Magazine actuality,Louis Vuitton Autumn Winter 2010 ##############,1; about,1, before you get carried abroad,1 in a sea of abhorrence,cheap louboutin classic black,1 and casting,1 the photo-moral stone, you should also know that there was no such evil affair,1 done and that W cover, even if accusable,1 of tons of airbrushing, cannot be put on angle,1 for the changing-bodies-scam!) (photos via)
While the main Photoshop altercation,1 appellation,1 is still held by Demi Moore’s W cover,Eres Lara 2009, here’s Kristen Stewart’s Dazed and Confused before the final photo editing maneuver.