In array apt rule China , and resolutely contrary

I know, this post came out, bound to detrimental objection. But the rule of law in terms of China had made.
I am well conscious of the seriousness of the judicial legislature, in adding to erroneous decision into achieve, injustice, alternatively can not be changed. Today, under the oppression of public opinion, the High Court resolved to retrial Yunnan Li case with illegal way to correct the abnormal light ahead the decree. So, Yunnan determine whether the High Court for retrial in line with laws and regulations and the rule of spirit?
Yunnan High Court cited Court should re-trial: (c) the aboriginal decision,Nike Shox Barn, ruled that the applicable law is absolutely wrong. Li Changkui case, the facts are clear intentional homicide, the law applicable to non-existent problem, Court of First Instance has given the death sentence. Only in the sentencing court of second example on a characteristic revision, and alteration the death penalty immediately for the reprieve, and the premier trial did not veto the facts found and the applicable law.
reprieve High Court verdict in Yunnan is still within the scope of the statutory sentencing. Any nefarious doing has decisive statutory sentencing range, the decide dealing with cases in particular, the defendant after conviction and sentencing have some discretion. Death quickly suspended for two years with the necrosis penalty beneath the Penal Code of crimes are highly solemn guilty penalties applicable, and are exceedingly severe penalties, the trial judge and the defendant does not surpass the seemly nefarious statute reprieve restrict the sentencing range. Therefore,Women's Air Max 97, the sentence reprieve in force as long as the facts are remove,Air Max 91, correctly applies the statute ought not be exchanged course retrial.
Some scholars have pointed out that the Supreme People's Court In the case of execution, not to improve the trial level, etc. amplify the defendant's sentence. and to deter the death penalty suspended for two years to take the case for reiterate by anybody means reprieve commuted to death immediately. This morale,Women's Air Max Ltd, the highest judicial organ in China should be commuted to the problem of the viewpoint of reprieve case, since the second trial and review shall not be changed, then the nuclear complicated has been extra efficient decisions can not be changed.
Lee case came to light on the network, the Say
himself does not consider herself a , pill circumstance sentencing is incongruous with alike cases, affect the consensus of judge, is awed along the tribunal of public opinion and Shaanxi Today, I am opposed to retrial Li Changkui, is no that Lee is not got apt, yet disapprove the use of illegal manner apt draw the so-called retrial. China's long-standing ministry of judge Li the case of breach proceedings to force a retrial,Women's Air Max 2010, is leap to make this step by tread to deepen the drawbacks.
Li case second instance commuted reprieve, clear light sentences, judges should be related to operation, but the force's decision should not be accessible commuted. Like football, misjudged misjudgment mediator whistle qualifications will be deleted, but the game has finished, but can not replay.
criminal act is the destruction of existing social narrations. In Li Changkui with violence undermines our society, the ambitious of the court for retrial in violation of procedural law, undermine the rule of law and the way to go,Women's Air Max 2009, this double damage, rule of law in China can not afford.