Quick Search


Tibetan singing bowl music,sound healing, remove negative energy.

528hz solfreggio music -  Attract Wealth and Abundance, Manifest Money and Increase Luck



 
Your forum announcement here!

  Free Advertising Forums | Free Advertising Board | Post Free Ads Forum | Free Advertising Forums Directory | Best Free Advertising Methods | Advertising Forums > Post Your Free Ads Here in English for Advertising .Adult and gambling websites NOT accepted. > Other

Other Post anything that does not fit in the above categories here.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-27-2011, 05:01 PM   #1
outlook248
 
Posts: n/a
Default Land taken for public use cannot be re-allotted S

Printed: Sunday, Jul 17, 2011, 22:38 IST
By Rakesh Bhatnagar | Area: New Delhi | Agency: DNA
The Supreme Court has ruled that land acquired for “public purpose” cannot be further allotted to “other beneficiaries” who might be engaged in a private venture.

The apex court pulled up a division bench of Rajasthan high court which had approved a ‘so-called’ policy ignoring the fact that people with connection in the power corridors and the economically affluent had illegally taken possession of acquired land and raised construction.
“What the high court has done is to legitimise the transactions, which were declared illegal by this court and was clearly impermissible. The HC’s understanding of the so-called policy framed by the government was clearly erroneous,Gemini,Tiffany Necklace,” a bench of Justice GS Singhvi and Justice AK Ganguly held last week.
This bench had earlier scrapped allocation of farmers’ land in Greater Noida area by the Mayawati government to some builders and realty players who wanted to construct to commercial complexes,Tiffany Melbourne, sky-rocket residential buildings,Tiffany Store, formula race tracks and multiplexes.
In this case,Diamond Tiffany, the government took away land from farmers at a throw-away price, saying it was needed for “public purpose”,Tiffany Engagement, but later passed it on to the rich and politically influential builders for putting up their dream projects. The state then charged many times more from the builders.
  Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:48 AM.

 

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Free Advertising Forums | Free Advertising Message Boards | Post Free Ads Forum