Office Standard HTML5 and JavaScript tools What c

Microsoft has been beating the HTML5 drum more and more loudly as its HTML5-compliant Online Explorer (IE) nine browser techniques the complete line. Provider execs have said HTML5 is central for the company’s cross-platform strategy. And IE nine is seemingly at the heart of Microsoft’s tablet push.
So what is Microsoft going to do, as far as putting its HTML5 development muscle where its mouth is?
Right now, Microsoft provides a number of HTML5, CSS and JavaScript tooling as part of Online Explorer (as of version 8). With IE nine, there will be even more of these so-called F12 tools for creating, testing and administering IE sites.
But from tips I’ve been getting lately, Microsoft is poised to take things up a notch — and might even announce some of its new tooling plans at the Mix ‘11 conference in mid-April.
Potentially on deck are new standalone tools and libraries for creating HTML5 client applications. There also could be additional support coming inside Visual Studio — beyond what’s slated for VS 2010 Service Pack 1 — for HTML5 and JavaScript. (The final version of SP1 is slated for some time in the first half of calendar 2011.) An aside: The Microsoft browser programmability team at the corporation has, as part of its charter, the creation of “Visual Studio-caliber tools for HTML5 client development across IE and Windows.”
“The only tools you should have to use to do HTML/JavaScript work are the browser and a good text editor. In-browser tooling helps make this feasible,Office Standard,” stated Andrew Brust, founder of Microsoft analysis and strategy supplier Blue Badge Insights.
However, Brust added, “That mentioned, there absolutely needs to become good HTML5 tooling in Visual Studio. The trend toward markup-intensive work with ASP.Web MVC and ASP.Net Web Pages with Razor makes this all the more urgent. Since developers are starting to move away from ASP.Internet WebForms server controls (which could encapsulate the HTML 5 rendering and corresponding JavaScript), developers really need the helpers to assist them in writing the new markup and script that HTML 5 requires themselves.”
Brust stated he could see screen-design tools for that <canvas> tag,Office Professional 2010 Key, and SmartTag dialogs or other GUIs for working with the <audio>, <video> and other new tags being appreciated by Visual Studio developers.
Scott Barnes, a former Softie and founder of FIXWPF.org, stated he’d expect any new Microsoft HTML5 tooling story would “likely to have Expression Blend/Web team’s involved given their current experience in this area.”
“The tooling would need to complement Adobe software more so than the way Expression Blend and Net have in the past,” Barnes said, “as that’s where the hearts and minds of designers are today.”
“The last time Microsoft approached these folks, they wanted to drag them across kicking and screaming for the way Blend / Web works,” Barnes stated. “It didn’t work and has failed miserably. This time, they need to dig deeper and work harder to complement Adobe technology in order to combine .Net and HTML5 (with PHP sprinkled in for server share).”
If Microsoft does end up fielding new tooling for building HTML5 apps, the new tools won’t usurp the place of the current F12 tools, Brust mentioned. Some devs may only need the existing tools; others may use the full set.
“IE and Visual Studio each need HTML 5 dev tooling,” he explained. “And while there is certainly overlap in the feature set each should have, they do in fact serve different audiences. The IE tooling would be for general diagnostic work with HTML and script on the client; the VS tooling would be for .Web developers building substantial Net server applications that also provide HTML 5 on the front-end.”
I asked Microsoft officials for comment on talk that new HTML5 and JavaScript tools may be on the docket and didn’t hear back. If/when I do, I’ll add any comments they provide. In the interim,Purchase Office 2010, what do you think Microsoft could — and should — do around HTML5 dev tools, going forward?