some worries 1a. cifs/smb continues to be a cleartext protocol.
if you transfer files too and from network shares; i get that data simply. in the event you safeguard the shares with a password; i get your username and password then break it devoid of an excellent deal of perform. in the event you use a 3rd social gathering authentication to stop the lm/ntlm windows native hashing; i get your username then acquire a bit more effort to interrupt your password hash. it really is all there in the open being sprayed all over the network.
1b. windows is a one particular way relationship with all other significant platforms.
i can ssh into an osx
Windows 7 Activation, bsd or linux centered platform to change settings or operate wonderfully strong software program through a terminal. i can scp or sftp information backwards and forwards between these platforms. i would like to push a document as much as my wife's osx machine; scp and there it truly is in her paperwork folder. i would like to mount a directory tree on any of those other devices (ie. network share); sshfs does that. heck, i can do all this too and from my pda. a gui app is the wanted need? ssh does that also, i regularily run firefox (put in on my desktop) from my notebook sitting on my couch in one more space. i can open mandriva's gui admin instruments by way of ssh and have the graphic goodness on my neighborhood desktop.
with windows
Office Home And Student 2010, winscp and putty support however you need to be working from your windows box. if you would like a graphic app from the windows machine, you will be needing the full weight of remote desktop or similar when all you actually needed was the plan exhibit.
sure
Windows 7 Home Premium, samba will help given that windows won't turn into compatible the other way. cifs/smb is nothing at all to become proud of although.
2. genuine, all platforms may be effected by malware though too distinct extents. i run av on my linux primarily based devices much more for the goal of not passing difficulties on to the windows devices we've to interact with. when i do have to deal with the contaminated windows machine, the primary factor i do is minimize the energy and boot a a lot more malware hostile os. avira livecd incidentally; avira does very good av in the freely obtainable choices.
3. i can not comment as i haven't utilised the remix desktop. if it can be such as the maemo desktop, it can be far more about one app on display screen at a time however many managing. with a machine that dimensions this isn't unreasonable. crippling could be only enabling 3 or less programs open at the moment.
6. "debian/ubuntu" - ubuntu is really a fork of debian so it really is a lot more like a lot of distributions are extended debian. mandriva has netbook installs which tends to make one an extended red hat. i'm unsure how close mandriva is too the red hat roots however aside from being an rpm primarily based program. the various flavors are what it really is all about although except if one can config there very own platform out of the fork mother or father.
7. obtaining a protected winxp set up in under 64mb of ram is an incredible thin in itself. i'd be intrigued to listen to a lot more about how one particular does that as i've some ram minimal difficulties on the go at the instant. i've got winxp sp3 down to around 300 mb ram but can not appear to get it lower without having killing necessary processes. with the os meant to be cellular and networked, less than sp3 just isn't a probability.
(i genuinely will be intrigued to listen to far more about how a single does winxp sp3 in below 64mb of ram.)
8. patches, yes. model, not so much.
upgrade from windows xp to windows vista to windows 7; it really is usually a comprehensive whipe and reinstall to the newer edition "upgrade" installs never operate except if the most recent ones have greatly enhanced.
upgrade from debian four etch to debian five lenny to debian six squeeze; make use of the standard bundle updater, modify references of "etch" to "lenny" in repository record
Office Standard 2010, utilize the typical package deal updater. i bumped my notebook from lenny to squeeze in an afternoon; no necessary drivers or isntall cd.. just the repository record change and "aptitude update && aptitude upgrade".
i'd love to see windows upgrade for the newer major model via windows update as a rolling distribution. now that would be providing benefit towards the end user.
9. win7 is what vista should have been though both do not yet live as much as the longhorn promises. we'll see how win7 does later this month and above the next quarter however it is already received a couple of "features" ms chooses not to address. nevertheless
Office Pro 2010, it may be the best windows because 2k (if the love of 2k over xp is any indication of it can be quality).
10. support depends on the distribution.
if it's a fork of ubuntu or debian than there can be a lot of support to be had. xandros, not much. at least support solutions for one distribution can often perform or lead a single towards the solution in one more distribution. heck, ubuntu and debian solutions are pretty interchangeable. i've even found solutions for ubuntu that where quickly modified to fix a mandriva issue.