God Of Science - 4_2916

???????????Then there is the phenomenon of chromosome packaging (see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome and peruse the "DNA packaging" section); which is an impossibly intricate process involving packing of 2 metres of DNA (in persons) into a (fewer than) sphere with 5 micrometer of diameter, meantime also organising it so that necessity parts could still be accessed because use by enzymes to patronize the cell and organism. The DNA is first wound nigh frameworks called nucleosomes; then these nucleosomes fashion solenoid-like frameworks and the process is carried on with the formation of loops among loops; finally giving rise to the metaphase chromosome, which resembles the shape of X with the help of a scaffold being formed and the loops of DNA being bruise around it. There are paperbacks written about merely just this chapter of DNA packaging and I depart it to you to decide how and why the DNA is packaged in such a access. All this would have seen like wizardry whether we were to magnify what is going on microscopes extra mighty than electron microscope (which is the best we have by the moment).
??????????? After all, the atheists stay atheists and creationists stay the same; due to both sides not convincing every other not even a single morsel. This shows that debates are not the way forward and a new approach should be taken; which I believe is dialogue, trying to know why the other believes in this way and attempt to find mutual grounds. May be there is a absence of knowledge �C this could be true for both sides; or due to certain taboos taxed on them during early life �C again could be true for both sides, not just for creationists. However I must say that I do not like the motif of atheists trying to prove that a Lord does not exist at each chance, when there cannot invest anyone evidence to demonstrate what they are saying. When they should be saying "I believe there is no Lord", they say "there is no god" which is the accurate inverse of what they are inquiring from creationists; respect for their faiths,head microgel!
???????????To conclude, science is an authentic source which tries to observe what happens in the material earth and tries to come up with explanations and it can only be complementary with religion and not against it since they try to answer different asset, with the latter trying to understand the metaphysical world and the signification of life.
??????????? As a Muslim, I muse that everything and anything that is around us could lead us to God (Allah) and the true religion. After all we have science �C which is an reliable source; we have history, another an reliable source; and the information acquired from these fields could rule out always the artificial religions and made up myths and lead to the truth. Thus for instance if a religion believes that smoking is good for your health,online sale hogan, then we can deduce from the learning gained from science that this religion is a deceit and manufactured by human �C probably by tobacco jobbers. While saying entire this, if an still absences to believe that smoking is good for them then we have to respect the alternative they are making; not averaging that we should not carry on warning them.
http://en.harunyahya.tv/
God Of Science - 4
???????????In debates between atheists and creationists (A&C), they appear to emulate a pattern very alter from usual debates. Initially either sides present their cases and then refute the oppositions demands below customary circumstances; yet in A&C debates someone uncommon happens: the Creationist side talks first and the Atheist all questions back along to what the additional has said; so there is not presentation being made about why atheism is more correct than theism. Atheists always finish their sentences by saying that there is "insufficient certify that there is a God", merely the creationist could say "there is insufficient testify against the subsistence of God" which would be equally true (in scientific terms). "What is your evidence that proves there is not God?" and "Why are you so sure that you're correct?". This is the location where things obtain stuck but at the end of the argue, care for is given (mostly) to the atheist; but why? Is it for they did not lose the debate? Be honest!
See also:
???????????I personally respect atheists as they are people who did not accept something just because their parents have told them to believe in them; but the struggle to detect the truth have to not end behind they have left their inherited religion, but truth-seeking must go on until death (by seeing into different religions), and this goes for everybody. People must also be sincere about whether "truth" is what they want or "what they want" is truth.
References:
???????????Before I start with the examples I want to say that atheist evolutionists imagine that an operating system (ie Windows) exists within organisms which recognise a certain DNA series (ie AATTCGA) as coding for a certain protein, which has been worked out as the Amino sour code (or genetic code); but what is not thought on is how that operating system came into being (who is the coder?). To make what I said more apparently; as I press the keys on my keyboard,cheap ghd hair straighteners, certain values arise on the shade. To make an sameness, "methodology of mutation" says that a book can appear from promiscuous pressing of the keyboards. I respect that belief but a large assumption is made; which is that the keyboard codes for amounts (letters); but who coded these? For example if you are using Microsoft Office Word to write a book,mbt for sale, then you know thatMicrosoft are the coders of this operating system. So moving on from the semblance; who coded the Genetic code? Why does UAG code for stop (or AUG for start and methionine etc)?? A real question to think about...
??????????? Coming back to what I said about "anything and everything" guiding us to God, there are a few examples which have caught my consideration during my studies and private experiences, which have made me mention "this cannot be done without a creator/designer" and increased my belief in God.
???????????Moving aboard to the marvels of our body; ?the premier instance namely going to be the sperm (see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm), which is the masculine gamete. The sperm's main parts are its pate, midpiece and its tail. In the pate, are the genetic message and the acrosome which contains enzymes needed to digest the ovum. In the midpiece, mitochondria are comprised, which generates ATP (stamina) for the sperm to travel with the help of its tail. Out of the hundreds of answers that tin come to mind, a few of them would be: How does the sperm kas long asit has to travel a long way so that it is equipped with mitochondria and a tail? How does the sperm kas long asit will meet the egg layer and is needed to be digested (and rig itself with suitable enzymes)? Without an smart designer none of the answers given to these answers would make sense.
Solomon et al, Biology 6th Ed. 2002
http://en.fgulen.com/
???????????Last one is the Yucca insect (which I will leave the miracles of this moth for you to quest), which shares an surprising bond with the Yucca plant. The plant needs the moth for pollination but the moth absences only to eat the juice from the plant. Even though it is not her job, the petticoat moth gathers pollen into a ball and carries it in her jaws to dissimilar Yucca; enters bloom and deposits pollen pellet on stigma. It then pierces ovary walls and lays eggs in the Yucca ovary; finally,timberland shoes, she climbs up to the anthers and collects pollen, ready to repeat process in a new bloom. However the grubs develop and eat only 20% of seeds; the grubs then nibble out of ovary, drip to ground and pupate until Yucca flowers again. This is being tried to be taught as a compact being signed between the two category; which is rubbish of way �C since catching a decision like that would necessitate intelligence from both sides; but that is what atheist scientists admit on (pure ideology)!
???????????Next one will be about our nostrils' angle which diverts exhaled ventilation coming from the lungs. This air would be full of humidity and it would have left the top side of our lip (where the mustachio forms) wet all the period leadership to provocation; but what we observe is the incredible use of geometry, our noses are neither also vertical alternatively curtate. The sometime would occasion provocation for said upon, whereas the latter would reason us dust, clay and strong wind to blow via our proboscis and reason suffocation. Another one to think about...

http://urdumembers.com/showthread.php?p=1864#post1864

http://www.cqyhxx.com/oblog4/u/66uio...011/64875.html

http://iliangan.com/showtopic-1119.aspx


Nothing's changed except for everything. The Pirates have played .500 ball over the past two weeks, bringing their record to 25-28, but with Wednesday night's trade of McLouth, the entire complexion of the season is altered. It's now clear that the Pirates are playing for the future, rather than 2009.