Killebrew on The End of War

Colonel RobertÂ*Killebrew comes to a conclusion I would endorse as both empirical and probable for reasons of economics - interstate warfare and military establishments are very expensive, whileÂ*irregular conflict is both cheap and accessible to many hands of various motives. Great power wars can still happen, but as ventures of existential risk. The End of War: Nonstate violence is the new norm In “The Invention of Peace,” British historian Michael Howard notes that it was the rise of the modern state, with powerful kings, that first brought the idea of “peace” to the Western world. So long as the king or government retained <a href="http://www.theapparelend.com/men-coats-bbc-jackets-c-1136_1192.html"><strong>bbc casual clothes</strong></a> sufficient power, determining “peace” and “war” remained the prerogative of the state, to be managed as required. Hence, the marching armies of August 1914. In the beginning years of the 21st century, though, we are entering into a new historical period. The state no longer has a monopoly on violence, and national borders are not as inviolate as they were in the long-ago 20th century. No other concept for managing fractious relations between states <a href="http://www.theapparelend.com/women-coats-c-1124.html"><strong>wholesale women suits</strong></a> has yet emerged. (Except, perhaps, the concept of “bigness,” as in, “I’m big enough to do this and get away with it.”) Since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, constant conflict has been the norm not only for the U.S. but also for much of the world, whether because of ideological struggle (the Balkans and Southwest Asia), political conflict (the Middle East and Eurasia), tribal wars (the Balkans and Africa), criminal insurgencies (Mexico, Central and South America) or terrorism (global). The pat-down at your local airport is a sign that the world has changed. Looking back, it’s hard to believe that Americans and Europeans used to vacation in spots where they would be beheaded today. In Central America - now the most violent region in the world - citizens report the social fabric that held their civic life together is disintegrating in the face of gang violence and government impotence. Five global conditions that have grown exponentially since the end of the Cold War are challenging governments everywhere: first, the enormous growth in criminal wealth over the past two decades, fueled by drug money, human trafficking, illegal arms sales and other crimes; second, mass migrations of peoples from south to north, pressing in on developed countries; third, the Internet and other technology that has brought violent organizations into the same technical sphere as governments; fourth, the free flow of arms that supplies firepower equal (or superior) to government security forces; and, finally, the empowerment of violent extremists who use the first four conditions to attack states and their legal institutions, whether to overthrow them, neutralize them for criminal or other purposes, or out of simple nihilism. ….It is increasingly clear that the greatest armed threat the U.S. faces is the attack on international civil order that violent extremists represent. The most likely use for U.S. armed forces in the coming century will be to help extend the rule of law to states struggling against extremists that also threaten the U.S. This does not mean the end of armored warfare, for example; future battlefields are impossible to predict. <a href="http://www.theapparelend.com/men-tshirts-hacket-c-1001_990.html"><strong>hacket uppers</strong></a> But the Afghan and Iraqi conflicts have already begun to align U.S. military thought toward the more complex world of the 21st century. Conflict changes both winners and losers, and the armed services’ world after Iraq and Afghanistan will not be a return to the good old days of predictable deployments and annual training cycles, any more than the Army in 1946 was able to go back to the garrisons of 1935. While the development of aggressive, highly skilled units and combined-arms capabilities is still very necessary, the uses to which they are put will change…. ADDENDUM: Posting from me will be light until next Monday. This entry was <a href="http://www.take3c.com/plus/guestbook.php"><strong>â–·â–·â–·â–·â–· Deluxe 10' Tan Patio Garden Offset Outdoor Hanging ...</strong></a> posted on Thursday, August 11th, 2011 at 4:27 am and is filed under 21st century, 3 gen gangs, 4GW, Strategy and War, Tactics, academia, analytic, military, military history, military reform, national security, networks, non-state actors, politics, primary loyalties, security, state failure, strategy, terrorism, theory, transnational criminal organization, tribes, war. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.