hot sunglasses Carrying 60,000 demolition company

It is understood that,2140 asics, March 11, 2008, the plaintiff Monte Demolition Ltd Hohhot Hohhot TEDA house demolition and the defense limited liability company signed a Party City food factory within the provisions of dormitory buildings and ancillary facilities were dismantled.


2008 年 11 on 10, the defendant in addition to the contract expressly agreed shown with the removal of 2 million deposit received, but also received a 4 million to the plaintiff,货车为避让轿车翻下高速路1死2伤(组图), the removal of fees and deposits, by its representative Xi All Silver wrote a receipt. The defendant received a total of 6 million security deposit, but all kinds of excuses not to the plaintiff started slow, dragged, and finally trying to shift the site of the Office also moved out,buy karen millen, Xi can not link all banks. Understanding by the parties after the plaintiff, the defendant did not have the mandate and powers of removal. That taken after the September 8, 2010,juicy couture jewelery 白叟所上缴元宝疑为假 被退还后发明可能非原件, Hohhot Terrace Demolition Ltd New District People's Court to the suit, asked the court shall order the defendant to Hohhot TEDA limited liability company house demolition demolition plaintiff double the return of 4 million bond a deadline to return to the plaintiff and the guarantee fee charged by removal of 4 million, loan interest paid 4,322 yuan over the same period.




New District People's Court accepted the case according to law after the hearing in public. The court held that: the original, the defendant signed the The defendant paid the plaintiff by removing about fees and deposits 6 million, to fulfill the contract obligations. But the defendant was the plaintiff in the collection of the fee, the contract will not be removed by the housing to the plaintiff,black ugg boots, breach of contract, shall be liable for breach of contract, compensation for the plaintiff's corresponding economic loss. Plaintiffs agreed in the contract of 2 million as the removal of deposit, double the return of the defendant,timberland s, but the contract of 2 million land use is clear margin or fee agreement is not clear,家长称小孩上学早到影响考评 校方称为学生安全, the plaintiff has no other evidence to support its claim,karen millen on sale, the plaintiff requested double the return of margin insufficient evidence, the plaintiff's other claims,hot sunglasses, the court shall be supported.
carry 6 million bond disappeared
based on Company removal costs 6 million, to pay the plaintiff interest on bank loans over the same period loss of 4,322 yuan, 954 yuan case acceptance fee by the defendant.
WASHINGTON Hohhot Hohhot Monte Demolition Ltd TEDA house demolition to the limited liability company to pay a 6 million to remove margin contracted demolition, mended to receive a margin Hohhot TEDA limited liability company house demolition even from the earth After being taken in Monte Demolition Ltd Hohhot Hohhot TEDA house demolition will anger a limited liability company report to the new city Hohhot People's Court, hit Yingleguansi. This reporter learned yesterday of the information.
□ reporter martial arts