Man and his wife set off natural gas sub- suicide

4 28 morning, Hefei Intermediate People's Court on the subject of public concern Bay bombings make the final verdict: Han Moumou dismissed the appeal and upheld the original verdict. December 13, 2010, the city Luyang District People's Court sentenced Han Moumou imprisonment 7 years, compensate all the losses with civil plaintiffs a total of 1,089,088 yuan.
■ event playback

2009 年 10 月 22 at 21 am, Hua Han Moumou in Bay Grand View 4 D402's home, its stored in your phone and lying in bed with other women in the video found by his wife surname Wang, Han Moumou a heated argument with the surname Wang, called his mother after the surname Wang million so and so, indicating that night with his son back to her parents.
2009 年 10 月 22 日 23 点 43 am to at 0:11 on October 23, Han Moumou surname Wang using a mobile phone to his wife and sister, respectively, send text messages, SMS content is
final decision

Han Moumou guilty upheld

Hefei Court held that the appellant Han Moumou attempted suicide, will be single-nozzle valve and the gas pipeline connection between the gas stove hose separation caused massive release of gas and sparks exploded indoor meet, resulting in a number of Bay Area residents and property damage public facilities district has identified the loss of price is 5.078 million yuan, and its actions constituted negligence to the crime of endangering public safety hazard approach, and not be less serious.
appellant Han Moumou caused by his crime victim's economic losses, according to the law should be compensated. Therefore, it should not be made the appellant Han Moumou civil liability is untenable. In summary, the present case the explosion occurred in a specific time, place, need a certain period of time can occur. According to the decision of the indirect evidence has been verified, the evidence can confirm each other between, and has formed a complete proof system, based on the evidence found facts of this case the process of logical and empirical judgments, the conclusion is only enough to eliminate all reasonable doubt . Therefore, the appellant argued his innocence and his defense attorneys Han Moumou facts of the case made clear, the views of insufficient evidence can not be set up against it. Accordingly, the court rejected the defendant Han Moumou appeal and upheld the original verdict.
five controversial

defenders point of view not to force

● Han Moumou Gumou counsel that the expert was hired experts in Hefei Gas Group, should be avoided.
The investigation Gumou is the North China Municipal Engineering Design Research Institute's senior engineer, was appointed in 2007 by units of natural gas in Hefei, special programs, and in the same year in October to complete the task. Which is not found Gumou Gas Group to hire experts in Hefei, Hefei Gas Group and without any interest, so there is no evasion.
● Han Moumou counsel that the Bay after the bombings, the analysis of on-site verification report can not be the basis of a decision.
According to the investigation,lunette ray ban, were identified in this report is to identify people by the scene, with views of the explosion causes of the Public Security Bureau of Hefei, after a gas leak on the Room D402, obtained by calculating the amount of analysis and identification report, the identification of objective , true, the conclusion clear, scientific method, the program legal.
● Han Moumou counsel that the evidence can only reflect the extraction of transcripts have gas stoves, does not indicate a hose is illegal evidence.
by the court of second instance to the investigating authorities, after verification, the identification of the overall gas stove and the hose is extracted, and transcripts to be recorded in the survey, site survey and have photos to prove the second instance trial this evidence Also to be shown in the certificate, cross-examination.
● Han Moumou counsel should have made identification of agencies to make hose stove evidence samples do not meet the description of the conditions identified in the comments.
The investigation was the performance of yin and yang of the hose line is not a flat surface, not fingerprints, nor have the investigation of experimental conditions.
● appellant Han Moumou defend his innocence in court, and the defense counsel suggested that the present case there is no direct evidence that the appellant Han Moumou mouth pulled one natural gas pipeline between the valve and the gas stove connect the hose, leading to gas release, that facts of the case is unclear, proved inadequate defense and defense views.
The investigation, subjectively, the appellant Han Moumou night of the murder have suicidal thoughts.
objective, gas stove pipe Single hose nozzle valve and the artificial separation of the separation system; explosion before the D402 there is enough room to reach explosive gas meter of natural gas margin; witnesses surname Wang, Wan XX , Moumou confirmed night of the murder of 22 o'clock, three into the D402 room, no smell of natural gas by adding foul odor, but after that time, 6 hours, D402 room only appellant Korea such and such a person; Hefei City Public Security Bureau issued by the scene of the explosion of analysis, identified as a flammable gas explosion Bay - air mixture explosion; North China Municipal Engineering Design Research Institute of identification issued by the explosion report confirmed: D402 rooms to meet the natural gas The only condition is D402 explosion gas pipeline single-room kitchen stove hose nozzle valve and the separation of non-normal, after 6 hours of natural gas released from gas and air mixture can spark an explosion indoor event.
trial Snapshots

remote trial, Han Moumou did not appear in court


approaching 10, the appellant Han Moumou still does not appear in court scene. Court staff said the way the trial will take on Han Moumou remote for sentencing.
11 court, in that this is a long-range trial, several plaintiffs in the case said the parties Xu, Han Moumou row court bailiffs took it back by 6 Luyang District, Hefei, the first to trial court.
wearing a white mask of the Han Mu-court out of control

9:55, 11 the court appeared Han Moumou big screen images, and he will accept the remote sentencing in jail . At the same time, an old woman wearing a white mask 11 into the court, she is Han Moumou mother.
Hanmu into the court, the straight son sitting beside arrived early.
10, the court on time trial, the judge read each of the relevant evidence in the case and verification results.

Hanmu at this time seems to have realized that the results of the second trial.
sentence after the trial, Han Moumou accept remote still insists on the defense before, stressed that he is being wronged.
In the out of court, Han Mu emotional control,
Han Moumou pronounced guilty of the second trial, the verdict will be effective immediately. Han Moumou If you still can not accept the verdict, can appeal to the High Court, but the appeal does not affect the enforcement of judgments.