Bank card credit card guy copied when the money wa

help to find evidence

10 万 deposits inexplicable loss

CCTV,Nike Air Max Tailwind, go to the bank to get money, a look at the results of the 10 million bank card money was gone.
bank salesperson told: removed a small card of 10 million yuan Fu. Fu said the bank card has been little to him, who can take away money?
police transferred out of the bank's surveillance video, video display and took the money, 10 million small operators are two men, the small operators simply do not know these two individuals.
Police said that the recent years,nike shox, there were a number across the country through the automated teller machines to steal credit card information and password depositors case, this crime ---- the way to have two steps the first step is in a safe play tricks on the door of the swipe card reader. The perpetrator is a homemade card reader security door in the bank security swipe card reader, when depositors take the time bank card credit card,nike shoes uk, bank card information is stolen by the perpetrator, perpetrators used stolen bank card information to come can then copy a bank card.
second step, the suspect will be the top of the automatic teller machine, the installation of a dense film device, when the depositors to withdraw and enter the password when the secret filming equipment would be filmed password savers .
analysis on surveillance video, police believe that small break in the money being used this way to take away the crime.
looking for bank claims, rejected the door

clues as relatively simple, the perpetrators fled crime molecules detected by the police has been unable to achieve a breakthrough, the case stalled. Anxious little character that there was money in the bank lost money gone, the responsibility ----,cool nike air max, the bank did not do in the management of the obligation to secure attention.
bank said that from the available evidence can not prove that the two stole the money and the small character does not matter, before the police do not solve the case, the bank liable for unfair.
pass the buck to find the evidence to be

small operators can not prove themselves and the thief does not matter, the small operator had to be playing a lawsuit ----- banks refused to provide evidence as to monitor their own negligence video.
As a small operator had to go to the police, can the police do not agree to give evidence: > Police said they were not individuals to small operators, small operators had made to the local court of evidence apply to the local court that they did not also there to extract evidence from the police. The judge said ---- they do not take our letter of introduction.
final result: the court can not prove the grounds of a small operator, dismissed his lawsuit.

CCTV