Microsoft Office Home And Student 2010 JUTLP - vol

[outlook064]

back to contents page
Suitable Acknowledgment? Julianne East
La Trobe University
j.east@latrobe.edu.au
Abstract
The issue in Australian universities about the prevalence of plagiarism has led for the improvement of policies about educational integrity and in flip centered focus around the should inform pupils about how to steer clear of plagiarism and how to effectively acknowledge. Instructing pupils the best way to keep away from plagiarism can appear to be straightforward if based on the notion that plagiarism is copying with no suitable acknowledgment. This paper evaluations the phrase 'proper acknowledgment' within the academic context and argues that appropriate acknowledgement can be quite a issue of context and perception. Within this paper kinds of plagiarism are reviewed, reasons for student plagiarism are thought to be and different contexts for acknowledgement and how these match in with concepts of attribution and originality are talked about. Feedback from global college students new to Australian educational culture provide insights and reveal that pupils in trying to grasp the guidelines of acknowledgment may be perplexed and involved about when and why they need to acknowledge. Introduction
At present, in Australian universities there exists a serious focus on plagiarism. And as plagiarism is claimed to get around the boost (Le Heron 2001, Park 2003, McCabe 2003, 2004), universities are eager to safeguard their reputations against unfavorable publicity. As a result, coverage statements have been made and shown, several of which, in an amusing apart, seem to be unacknowledged copies (Pecorari 2001, p. 242). University lecturers are anticipated to be much more conscious with the existence of plagiarism in students' perform, to show college students that they need to reference and also to alert pupils that they need to steer clear of plagiarism. This duty to show college students about steering clear of plagiarism can look like easy if depending on the idea that plagiarism is really a sort of cheating by which the copying of another's (or one's individual) function is just not acknowledged along with the assumption that there are widespread understandings about what and how to reference. The truth is, these concerns of copying, acknowledgement and referencing usually are not basic, and teaching pupils the way to stay away from plagiarism is just not always easy. Bloch (2001, p. 209) explains that:

The integration of previously printed created texts right into a new text is governed by a set of policies, the violation of which can be named plagiarism. These policies about writing depending on source texts have not usually been as clear-cut as numerous lecturers and students have assumed, specifically with regard to teaching about plagiarism.

The specific situation gets to be much more difficult after we factor in diverse perceptions in regards to the appropriateness of copying. Within the situation of university pupils who use English like a second language and therefore are new to Australian academic culture, considerations about what to duplicate, the way to copy and how to have a voice in educational composing make the understandings and teaching of plagiarism even significantly less clear minimize. These considerations ended up unveiled to me when I interviewed 10 international students from equally Scandinavian and Asian countries and collected on the internet discussions from 52 pupils representing sixteen countries. A few of these college students have been quoted in this paper. For these students, the boundaries between emulation and plagiarism weren't usually sharply defined, and a few had been referencing merely to avoid accusations of plagiarism. Naturally referencing is a lot more than acknowledging a supply for 'ethical' factors. On this paper I contend that proper acknowledgement is usually a make any difference of perception, context, and culture. I begin with the make an effort to outline plagiarism by discussing some examples and I review why college students plagiarise. I then examine contexts for acknowledgement, and just how these match in with concepts of attribution and originality. Lastly, I conclude that those that are making an attempt to grasp acknowledgement in educational texts are alert to the troubles encompassing plagiarism.
Varieties of Plagiarism
Plagiarism can get a number of forms. Probably the most quickly recognizable of those is copying a person else's perform with no type of acknowledgement. Not remarkably the originators of perform may be aggrieved if another person reaps undeserved rewards from their hard labour. Lecturers can be aggrieved if a student has received or attempts to obtain undeserved gain by copying from another's operate or presenting as original earlier submitted operate. Copying one's very own work with out acknowledgment and pretending it to become a very first time creation can be a sort of plagiarism.
Sometimes pupils will duplicate chunks of another's perform to their text, as well as even though there exists acknowledgement it isn't produced obvious that the words and ideas usually are not the students'. In yet another type of plagiarism, pupils will try and mix with each other another's phrases with their very own (Wilson 1997). If this can be just making use of the regular educational terms to get a specific subject, then this really is portion from the method of mastering the language of the discipline, if it is taking an author's distinctive phrases it becomes plagiarising.
There are other varieties of plagiarism which can be a lot more innovative and are more difficult to detect (Martin 1994). These incorporate a practice, not abnormal in undergraduate composing, of referring to resources which had been cited inside a secondary resource with no acquiring accessed those sources. An illustration of that is when pupils duplicate quotations which happen to be cited in text publications and then declare the initial source fairly compared to text book being a reference. In so carrying out the writer can look like nicely study and seems to get researched past the prescribed text e-book. One more way writers plagiarise would be to use the references from a text, then neglect to acknowledge the use of that text because the resource. This lack of acknowledgement denies rightful recognition for your writer who to begin with collected the references and reviewed the literature. In some instances this can be since the author desires to be witnessed as obtaining done the job of accumulating the references; it may also be considered a case of ignoring the first text because none of its suggestions ended up utilized and also the referencing program (specially the writer date program) doesn't let for these a room.
Maybe probably the most controversial for teachers who offer product essays, papers and examples of research layout, will be the apply of copying the organization and construction of another's arguments and study. Here we are able to see a blurring of the boundaries amongst learning the way to do a thing and generating some thing that is not unique. On the most basic stage students are taught that an essay has an introduction, body and conclusion; past this, students could be presented models demonstrating the elements inside of this framework, as well as models of argument and proof and crucial evaluation. Although following a design may very well be considered acceptable, not so the act of expedient reproduction during which a author will take another's operate and just rewords the arguments and proof from that function. That is a case of plagiarism because the collection of concepts, the organization of individuals suggestions and the thinking of how people ideas suit with each other has long been the perform of another. Although it might be argued the act of rewriting re-creates one thing which may be comprehended with new meaning, it shouldn't be claimed as some thing authentic. As Coleman (2004, p. 278) explains, 'even if we concur together with the plagiarist that by putting some thing into a distinct context they've got modified its meaning, it doesn't adhere to from this they have created an unique standpoint. Usually, what they've completed is minimize by themselves of this task'. This is the sort of plagiarism which may be hard to detect and confirm, particularly from the situation of competent and calculating writers. Surely, word matching detection resources these as Turnitin can be not likely to cause recognition of such plagiarism if it is the perform of competent paraphrasers.
Some students will plagiarise knowingly; other people will do it inadvertently (Chanock 2003, Dawson 2004). There are also conditions conducive to plagiarism, and there are numerous possible explanations for why college students plagiarise. Occasionally pupils may plagiarise given that they can and no person stops them; students also might be driven by dread of failure or even the stress to succeed (Dawson 2004); they can be ignorant of how they can be anticipated to construct expertise and how to reference, plus they can arrive from academic cultures wherever copying is surely an anticipated studying apply.
An instance of the circumstance in which availability of possibility allowed plagiarism was reported by a pupil who explained that simply because his lecturers had not objected to your copied sentences in his composing jobs he had seen no cause to change his practice. These plagiarism would not be tolerated in all topics, and unfortunately for this pupil, he is not understanding educational citing conventions. It could be that this student's lecturers don't have enough time to train abilities; maybe they do not know how to teach these skills, or even they are unaware they are getting plagiarized function. Presented enhanced class sizes and function stress, this sort of scenarios might be widespread in Australian universities (Parker 2003).
Students who are unable to retain up using the demands of a program, for whichever purpose, probably a weakness in academic abilities or language capabilities, could resort to plagiarism out of desperation. A pupil, who before returning to review had seen herself like a skilled professional having a great deal of duty, explained why she had as soon as plagiarized. 'My ideas had been I've to pass it or I will not be able to complete other points...the difficulty of your subject was genuinely mind-boggling. The lecturer wasn't too approachable. I did not genuinely have that help.' The identical student also documented that earlier her lecturers had offered her a information about steering clear of plagiarism, but she had not recognized why and the way she really should acknowledge resources. This student, although ashamed of her action, argued that with greater instructing she wouldn't have resorted to plagiarism.
Better instructing in order that college students realize the content material and issues within a distinct topic may possibly reduce aware plagiarism. Such teaching could also lead pupils to be far more than innovative paraphrasers and do more than regurgitate information, to ensure that they will mirror and comment on what they can be mastering and can build and apply understanding. Even so, college students may well nonetheless not acknowledge based on the particular rules of Australian academic culture. They might be ignorant of what on earth is anticipated or they might use a distinct set of understandings. An undergraduate student noted that in China in case you are a student it is 'ok to copy an expert's words into your creating [without a reference] because you are making use of revered support to your concepts, but this isn't acceptable for publishing if you needs to be demonstrating personal findings'. This illustration demonstrates that what may possibly be deemed legit appropriation in a single context is plagiarism in another context since it lacks explicit acknowledgement.
Acknowledgment
Like numerous other universities,Microsoft Office Home And Student 2010, La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia has lately produced a coverage which has driven a variety of tactics to coach pupils about avoiding plagiarism and the will need for acknowledgement. This policy defines plagiarism as 'the reproducing of an individual else's phrases, suggestions or findings and presenting them as one's own without having correct acknowledgement' (La Trobe University, Educational Misconduct Coverage). I do not have any argument with these a definition; it seems correctly acceptable that a single need to correctly acknowledge, accepting naturally that what exactly is appropriate in a single context could be really different in yet another.
Seasoned writers can base the choice to acknowledge around the perception that some resources and a few suggestions have much more worth than other people, rather than the vital to become sincere. Citing from a prestigious journal lets the reader understand that the writer has go through this sort of a journal and is as much as date with all the latest pondering and findings on a matter. About the other hand, an notion or organization of concepts in an unrefereed text, no matter how exciting, is likely to be less authoritative and so carry less bodyweight as proof. For instance, an e-mail from a chat area is not likely to carry as significantly weight as verifiable study (Bloch 2004, p. 221), so it's not surprising that these communications aren't often acknowledged. Similarly, some writers and researchers carry far more authority than other individuals.
Actually, this is a problem I've been reflecting on in my own academic writing apply, and specifically in writing this paper because the following problem demonstrates. In getting ready to write down this paper I regarded as that there could be various cultural understandings of when, why and just how to attribute, and accordingly I desired to existing suitable chosen support. An illustration of this kind of support is within the perform of Pennycook, a well-respected commentator on English language educational culture. He pointed out the idea of plagiarism 'needs for being understood inside the distinct cultural and historical context of its improvement, additionally, it wants to be understood relative to substitute cultural practices' (Pennycook 1996, p. 218). I could have also used other sources, for I have go through this kind of concepts elsewhere, but my preference is for your acclaimed and erudite Pennycook. Actually, I didn't get the idea that plagiarism has distinct cultural contexts from reading Pennycook; I don't know where the concept came from, but probably, actually, Pennycook may genuinely be the original source of the concept. Perhaps I picked up the concept from conversation or observation or some thing I examine someplace. These sources would hardly be outstanding, and in any case what is the point of creating a claim unless it is to be taken seriously. In another instance, I might decide on not to acknowledge a resource. I go through the Lancaster University document 'Cultural Attitudes to Plagiarism: Developing a much better knowledge of the wants of college students from varied cultural backgrounds referring to problems of plagiarism' (Introna, Hayes, Blair & Woods 2003) but found no specific items that I wished to utilize for my study; however, the bibliography gave me some good references. Need to I give acknowledgement for a good selection of sources? (See Martin 1994, for any discussion with the various forms of plagiarism.) I surely would if Pennycook wrote it. So, somewhat than acknowledge to avoid plagiarism, I select to refer to resources in order that my producing is placed inside a selected discussion. Hunt in his article 'Four Good reasons to become Happy about Internet Plagiarism' (2003, p. 4 of 5) gives a succinct explanation of why scholars acknowledge.

Scholars -- writers generally -- use citations for a lot of points: they establish their own bona fides and currency, they advertise their alliances, they carry work to your attention of their reader, they assert ties of collegiality, they exemplify contending positions or outline nuances of difference among competing theories or concepts. They are doing not use them to defend themselves versus potential allegations of plagiarism.

An implication of that is that novice academic writers will need to learn the way to use citations to their advantage. Their decisions about which texts to utilize as proof and which to acknowledge may must be determined by comprehension certain contexts. A student new to an existing physique of information inside a topic will be discovering who and what evidence carries excess weight. This involves dealing with the huge amount of information now available and deciding which texts and which writers are witnessed to become valued.
One more issue for novice writers trying to sound appropriately educational will be the acquisition and appropriation of new terminology. Often students repeat phrases and terms given that they don't have a ready repertoire of synonyms; at times they repeat because they do not yet have the understanding and expertise to be confident about paraphrasing. One way that I build my terminology is by working through texts and appropriating terms to my own creating. Naturally I are aware that when I meet a exclusive and newly created expression or approach I must acknowledge the source. The much more familiar I am with a subject the far more confident I am in performing this; about the other hand, when I meet new terms in a very new topic I am tentative about mining vocabulary. It follows then that the greater my exposure to a selected subject the much more aware I am of what exactly is commonly utilised and requirements no acknowledgement in contrast to that which might be attributed to an individual and so requires acknowledgement. Or I could say the far more familiar phrases and terms become, the much less aware I have become of making out their meaning.
Gee (1996, p. 140) points out that when we have mastered something we have no consciousness of it, and eventually as Chanock explains: 'We learn to see items the way other people see them, by naming them in the ways that other people name them' (2002, p. 51). Until these time the novice author could be disadvantaged, which indicates the asymmetry of power in language (Habermas 1987). Utilizing new terminology is a single way that novice writers build their vocabulary and make an effort to sound educational; recognising unacknowledged special phrases is one particular way that lecturers determine that acts of plagiarism are committed.
There happen to be times when We have been inspired and checked by the suggestions and phrases of other people but have not necessarily acknowledged these. My colleagues and examine group happen to be a great assist in my research and as being a make any difference of etiquette I can give due acknowledgement for this in a thesis, but I rarely acknowledge this input in other texts. This may be as considerably a shortcoming from the referencing method as a lot as anything else. I realized this when trying to find a place with this paper to acknowledge the particularly helpful comments manufactured by a colleague, Elizabeth Burns Coleman. The problem is in relaying a clear picture with the degree of your input and its effect. Whether acknowledged or not, I consider the input of my colleagues and exposure to their suggestions to be a collaboration vital to my understanding procedure and expert growth, and I understand that this is not collusion, and further I am comfortable about placing myself because the author (cf. Myers 1998, p. 9).
Acknowledgement for authorship of and input right into a text can vary. Occasionally, language and academic capabilities advisers happen to be extensively involved in instructing pupils the way to analysis and just how to write and present study but have acquired no public acknowledgement, just since the role of editors is often ignored (Scollon 1995, p. 8). In contrast there are instances of an author being listed despite the fact that this person has had little or no involvement inside the creating method. If this 'author' has a prestigious reputation lending a name to a publication is within the interests from the other listed authors, whose perform may well otherwise not be accepted for publication. Understandably this sort of acknowledgement, albeit not a measure of effort yet understood by some as valuable, is controversial. La Trobe University has declared this apply of 'Honorary authorship' to become unacceptable (see La Trobe University Guidelines for your Conduct of Analysis 2003,Cheap Windows 7, p. 9).
In some conditions and with some university texts it is accepted practice the writer as wordsmith just isn't acknowledged. Administrative communications could be created by a person or persons other than the named official. I am not alarmed or concerned if the message to all staff from the vice-chancellor isn't personally composed by him (cf. Martin 1994). Whilst I expect his direction of and obligation for this kind of a task, I do understand that the demands of this sort of a senior role would mean task designation to other people, and I usually do not expect people other people to become acknowledged. My response towards the message to all staff is the vice-chancellor is being the writer. Scollon (1995, p. 7) explains this kind of a perception of authorship by using Goffman's communication categories: the vice-chancellor could be witnessed as having the role of standing behind and being responsible for the communication, although the person who prepares the communication text is understood to 'animate' the words with the vice-chancellor. Scollon also feedback on this explanation and asks us, as does Martin (1994), to consider that because these roles are embedded in the institution individuals within the institution may be blind to your rights of those who actually publish texts. While this might be so, vice-chancellors will be well-advised to ensure that any writer of their texts has referenced properly, because it must be the vice-chancellor who risks public disgrace from accusations of plagiarism.
Accusations of plagiarism are not limited towards the university context. Just as senior university staff may not publish their administrative communications, so politicians employ speech writers. Acknowledgement is rarely presented to speech writers, but then they are doing not wear obligation for the subject material and delivery of 'their' speeches. This can result in accusations of plagiarism not directed for the person who wrote and sourced the text, but instead to your politician who delivered the text. In April 2004, the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, accused the then Leader with the Opposition, Mark Latham, of stealing suggestions and phrases from President Clinton's 1997 State with the Union address (ABC Online). Latham, not his speech author, responded for the accusations of plagiarism of Clinton's speech, also no doubt worded by a speech author.
It could be argued that a person may possibly not discern that what on earth is proper acknowledgement in one forum is just not applicable in one more. In the tradition of Black American oratory, using another's words, style and framework is legitimate. Tannen (1989) in her evaluation of Jesse Jackson's speech in 1988 towards the Democratic National Convention, showed that a lot of your power of this speech was in its heavy borrowing from Martin Luther King's famous acceptance speech "I Possess a Dream" for your Nobel Peace Prize. This 'borrowing' could also be comprehended as appropriation of terms that Jackson and his audience had come to believe in. In contrast, while Jackson's appropriation is acceptable in its oratory genre, it can be argued that the instances of copied text in King's doctoral thesis lacked proper acknowledgement. Responses to this have varied. Scollon (1995) and Martin (1994) have indicated that this may be proof of diverse cultural traditions, and Moore Howard (1995, p. 793) points out that 'we carry the practices and conventions of a single community into another'. Randall (2001, pp. 208 - 213) analyses this view from a number of perceptions, even considering that the lack of acknowledgement in King's operate amounted to plagiarism which had been tolerated simply because his supervisors had been racist and had not expected much more of him.
There are other circumstances wherever what on earth is considered plagiarism in a single community because it lacks acknowledgement could be deemed acceptable apply in one more. A law pupil from Denmark who was confused about the referencing requirements in her studies in Australia explained:

Normally, back home it's the argument itself that's important and not the author. So I can use as numerous arguments from books as I want, with out referencing anything. I do not need to use name or page - I just use the argument. For me that's normal. Sometimes, if there's a good sentence I can copy the words,Office 2010 Home And Student, I can compose the whole sentence and I do not must use references at all.

In some cultures there exists an expectation that copying can be a learning strategy.

In my initial language, [you] don't have the concept of plagiarism, you can copy without having acknowledgement. [We] think duplicate others' work is actually a good habit for mastering, on this position, it's completely different for the concept of plagiarism... Depending on the cultural differences [with] Australia, plagiarism makes me feel very confused, it is new for me.

An explanation from one more pupil demonstrates why he perceives that acknowledgement is just not constantly necessary:

... in some Asian nations or few western nations, only [when] the whole article is copied by students and utilised as their very own can [it] be thought to be as plagiarism, and it really is accepted to work with some good sentences or phrases from other reading material directly because college students have to show they have examine widely ahead of writing their essays.

Even though these examples support the thought that copying and repetition is usually a reputable understanding strategy (Biggs 1997), if students applied this strategy in an Australian university they might be accused of plagiarism.
Ideas, Originality and Attribution
One particular way of viewing text creation is with the idea of your author like a producer of private property whose efforts needs to be acknowledged. This kind of a perception has credibility when the accordance of reward is according to effort which has produced some thing unique. And as Bloch (2001, p. 211) notes, students are disinclined to attribute authorship to that which they consider as 'common knowledge' and within the 'public domain', which parallels my before declare that 'commonly used' terms want no acknowledgement. The problem as a pupil explained is that, 'sometimes it really is difficult to distinguish what might be deemed as plagiarism, as there exists no clear dividing line between general understanding and a person's voice.' Yet another pupil was concerned about when an idea became widespread expertise and when acknowledgement was necessary:

We rewrite what we have learned and typically we use different words from the textbook. But the ideas we create about are still from the textbook...I think I require some a lot more apply in when to work with references, because too often I ask myself if I really should have used one or not. The textbooks can often describe ideas thoroughly when they are used for that first time. Some of this may be common sense or understanding or one thing you just know about. Then you tend not to feel you should acknowledge the textbook. No, it is not easy!

From these students' dilemmas we could learn that acknowledging effort and attributing tips could be problematic if the divide in between what everybody knows and what an individual writer has created is not clear.
Yet another limit for the concept that property rights rest with individual creation of text could be the utilization of technology for text creating and sharing. Technology has increased what's inside the public domain and produced it easier to access and plagiarise. I also suggest that this availability and the variety of texts have created it tougher for the user to envisage the quoting of text as taking someone's property. Bloch citing Kolko (2001, p. 211) asks us to consider how pupils may possibly perceive texts around the internet and whether or not all these should be cited from the identical way. Whilst it's distinct that an online educational journal requires formal acknowledgment, would this also be so for information from a site wherever the writer is not obvious, say a university web page explaining plagiarism? Furthermore, on the internet discussions demonstrate the collaborative and derivative advancement of ideas, and so challenge the notion of your individual author generating private property. This notion of proprietorship, however, remains the premise upon which university assessment is based mostly. The conundrum for the pupil author is in knowing the way to proper what appears to get publicly available, to ensure that they will produce texts which will be assessed as if they can be individual creations.
Understandably, some college students perceive ideas as being individually created with property rights. 1 of your interviewees explained that whenever she got an concept from other individuals she would give some sort of recognition, but she deemed it unfair when protocol prevented her from claiming sole authorship of an thought.

... occasionally I feel that what they said is actually my thought also, it's what I feel, but often there We have to do some kind of quotation but it's not fair to me at the same time. ...anyway I just want to stick to the rule, not make a big fuss on it so I just give a citation there. That's why I feel it's unfair to me because it's my idea as well.

This pupil, fairly than seeing her contribution as an evaluation of perceptions of expertise, and that the worth of her academic opinions might be enhanced by verification, looks to be imagining ideas as individual productions or discoveries. The pupil describes herself as just following principles, which implies a sense of frustration and also that the must acknowledge would seem 'unfair' to her, which puts her at odds with a few of the factors for citing resources. Based on Bloch (2001, p. 221) 'There is also a rhetorical purpose for citing sources. Educational writing specifically relies on the kind of social cohesiveness, what Myers (1985) refers to because the need for writers to demonstrate how their ideas are connected with what has previously been claimed.' Without having an appreciation of this connectedness, I can see that such a pupil may feel that her individual voice can't find a place in academic composing.
Some published writers also see the attribution of ideas as personally relevant and practise the curious act of self-citation. Obviously, this sort of writers refer to their very own previous works and suggestions to not acknowledge another's 'property' or creation, nor do they always reference for the sake of transparency and honesty, rather they are likely to be alerting the reader to your writer's price and place in an existing system of understanding. Actually, as Hyland (2003) argues, self-citation is usually self-promotion. Self-citation, however, will not work in really exactly the same way for the unpublished author. As an educational abilities adviser I have seen many examples of self-copying in students' essays. These consist of minor examples this kind of as 'reusing' a few sentences and reusing empirical research too because the more blatant examples of resubmitting entire essays. I am yet to see any illustration of self-attribution within a student's producing.
It is not tough to see why students may be confused by the concept that authorship of a text could be the construction of authentic concepts. As 1 pupil protested: 'if one particular thing is told you by your mother, and your mother is told by your grandmother and the way can I get the original? In which does an notion arrive from, it's generation to generation...' Barks and Watts (2001, p. 254) in their chapter advising within the teaching of referencing, claim that since the concept of 'originality' requires discussion they've got been 'purposefully vague' in their utilization of the expression, which does not leave the reader any the wiser.
The truth is, originality in academic text creation isn't going to mean that an writer has created new tips only from 'imagination'. Fairly the author works inside of an existing entire body of information and makes decisions about which concepts and proof to utilize from sources, what could be said about these suggestions and so what other perspectives can be brought to this new discussion. Comprehending originality in this way could make the purpose of acknowledgement clearer for these college students who are worried about attributing the 'original' source of an concept.
Contextualising the concept of originality in concepts and also the will need for attribution as cultural notions might be a way of knowing what new student writers confront. In his examination from the history of Western thought, Pennycook (1996, p. 205) points out that the writer and originality are constructed notions, and by referring to Kearney he explains how imagination, once viewed as being a reproduction of divine inspiration, in modern western considering has become the topic of human production. He explains that by medieval times , truth was linked to authenticity which might be verified through the authority of an individual author. Although scientific notions had been to become witnessed as unauthored 'facts', within the area of literature, individual creativity was recognized and valued. Pennycook explains that this move to seeing works as individualized and therefore authentic is actually a Western cultural perception. Pupils new to Australian academic culture may be trying to kind out such cultural perceptions. They will be working out that they must state, in a very prescribed way, a supply for certain suggestions, and that there is certainly a proprietorship of (some) tips which is taken very significantly by their lecturers.
Conclusion
This paper has touched on a range of troubles regarding plagiarism and 'proper' acknowledgement. It's obvious that acknowledgment can have different purposes, including attributing to a selected source to prevent plagiarism. Furthermore the need to acknowledge might be context specific. In reflecting on my personal explanations of when I acknowledge and proper I can see that I write as an individual who would seem comfortable in describing the peculiarities of acknowledgment. By contrast, the responses from the global students occasionally reveal a perplexed worry about when and why they should acknowledge. These issues indicate that for newcomers to Australian educational culture, notions of acknowledgement and attributing tips are not familiar. It could also be that, in attempting to realize the policies of educational communication, these pupils are aware of that which those who are culturally familiar are no longer aware.
These conclusions invite speculation that when students, lecturers and the university communicate about plagiarism they're able to arrive for the conversation with different understandings, plus they could also leave with differences. I have created few suggestions about how to improve these communications, but hopefully this provides opportunities for future study. I hope that the insights of the college students and my discussion will contribute to greater comprehension of the issues confronting students when they try to correctly acknowledge.
References
ABC News Online (Last Update: Wednesday April 21, 2004, Posted: 11:05pm). 'Latham accused of stealing speech'.
[Accessed 1 Aug. 2005]

Barks, D & Watts, P 2001, 'Textual Borrowing Methods for Graduate-Level ESL Writers', in Belcher D & Hirvela A (eds.), Linking literacies: perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, Michigan.

Belcher, D & Hirvela, A 2001, Linking literacies: perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, Michigan.

Biggs, J B 1997, 'Teaching across and in cultures: The issue of worldwide students', Studying and Instructing in Higher Education: Advancing global perspectives: proceedings from the Higher Education Investigation and Development Society of Australasia Conference, 8-11 July, 1997, Adelaide.

Bloch, J 2001, 'Plagiarism and also the ESL Pupil: From Printed to Electronic Texts', in Belcher D & Hirvela A (eds.), Linking literacies: perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections, Ann Arbor,Office 2010 Keygen, University of Michigan Press, Michigan.

Chanock, K 2003, 'Before we hang that highwayman - The LAS advisers' viewpoint on plagiarism', in Marsden, H & Hicks M (eds.), Academic Integrity: Plagiarism and other perplexities, UniSA, Adelaide.

Coleman, E 2004, 'Some thoughts on plagiarism, forgery and also the nom de plume', in Dobrez, L (ed.), An ABC of Lying, Australian Scholarly Press, Melbourne.

Dawson, J 2004, 'Plagiarism: What's really going on?', in Teaching and Understanding Forum: Seeking Academic Excellence, Murdoch University, Western Australia.

Gee, J 1996, Social linguistics and literacies: ideology in discourses, Falner Press, London.

Habermas, J 1987, Knowledge and human interests, Polity Press, Oxford.

Hyland, K 2003, 'Self-Citation and Self-Reference: Credibility and Promotion in Academic Publication', Journal of the American Society for Details Science and Technology, vol. 54, no 3, pp. 251-259.

Hunt, R 2002, Four Reasons to get Happy about Internet Plagiarism, St. Thomas University [Online]
[Accessed 1 Aug. 2005].

Introna, L, Hayes, N, Blair, L & Wood, E 2003, Attitudes to Plagiarism: Creating a greater understanding of the desires of students from numerous cultural backgrounds relating to problems of plagiarism, Lancaster University, Lancaster. [Online]
[Accessed 1 Aug. 2005].

La Trobe University Academic Misconduct Coverage [Online]
[Accessed 1 Aug. 2005].

La Trobe University Guidelines for your Conduct of Analysis [Online]
[Accessed 1 Aug. 2005].

Le Heron, J 2001, 'Plagiarism, studying dishonesty or just plain cheating: The context and countermeasures in Info Systems teaching', Australian Journal of Instructional Technology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 244-264.

Martin, B 1994, 'Plagiarism: a misplaced emphasis', Journal of Info Ethics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 36-44.

McCabe, D 2004, 'The US and Canadian Experience', Symposium on Promoting Educational Integrity, University of Newcastle NSW.

Moore Howard, R 1995,Office Standard 2007, 'Plagiarisms, Authorships, along with the Academic Death Penalty', College English, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 348-355.

Myers, S 1998, 'Questioning Authority: ESL/EFL, science, and teaching about plagiarism', TESL-EJ, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1-15.

Park, C 2003, 'In Other (People's) Phrases: plagiarism by university pupils - literature and lessons', Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 28, no.5, pp. 471-488.

Parker, P 2003, 'In your 'own' phrases: Mastering advisers on pupil difficulties with keeping away from plagiarism during the transition to university', 7th Pacific Rim 1st Year in Higher Education Conference Proceedings, QUT Brisbane.

Pennycook, A 1996, 'Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism', TESOL Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 201-230.

Randall, M 2001, Pragmatic plagiarism: authorship, profit, and power, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

Scollon, R 1995, 'Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse', Language in Society, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-28.

Tannen, D 1989, Talking Voices, CUB, Cambridge.

Wilson, K 1997, 'Can note-taking solve the plagiphrasing problem?', EA Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43-52
Print
//-->
back to contents web page