the UAW had to put the most on the table
 

Originally Posted by radix023I'm confused about the whole process. From what I recall in previous negotiations paypal lingerie , the UAW would usually do Ford first because they got the best deal there, then they would demand that Chrysler and GM match that deal. (of course, the economic sanity of these agreements never entered consideration)This time they did GM first, where as far as I can tell air jordan heels , the UAW had to put the most on the table, picking up responsibility for health care (how long before we see indictments of union bosses for mishandling such funds?). The UAW is also saying that they are not going to try and make the contracts match. Well from my years of living in the area and having many family members as UAW members, I think they pick a "strike target". It is usually the one of the Big 3 doing the best, so basically it is down to GM and Ford at that point. Then they hammer out a deal, with or without a strike, and then the other two are supposed to basically fall in line with the first contract. So the first company was almost like a proxy for the other two. This cycle things are obviously quite different.Good point about union fat cats and corruption with the health care plan. I think you are dead on and I give it about a decade for something to float to the top and become public jordans for women heels , but it will be within the next 2-3 years for the actual corruption to start.